What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 128 Stack Exchange communities.

Because the flag-weight has increased to 750, and (if I understood it right) you'll get less and less weight with every flag towards 750, I'd like to suggest two new Badges:

  • Sheriff (Silver): Achieved a flag weight of 700
  • Clint Eastwood or Marshal1 (Gold): Achieved a flag weight of 749

1: As suggested by martin clayton.

Edit:
I've started this bounty, because now that there are people actually getting a flag weight of 750 in multiple sites, don't you think it would be a good idea to implement this brilliant idea which is so popular with many users? Jeff? please?

share|improve this question
23  
the 750 badge could have the subtitle "I shot the asymptote" –  Pëkka Mar 11 '11 at 23:14
4  
Did you realise Deputy is a SILVER badge? What would that make your 2 badges? –  RichardTheKiwi Mar 11 '11 at 23:17
    
@Richard: True, good point...I'd say silver and gold. But then there would be two silver badges and one gold. –  Time Traveling Bobby Mar 11 '11 at 23:21
3  
I thought Mark said you can't ever reach 750... –  John Mar 12 '11 at 3:03
7  
@John, clearly he meant "Chuck Norris: Achieved a flag weight of 750" –  Brad Mace Mar 12 '11 at 6:39
1  
Hardly a challenge @Boddy ;-) You're already at 615.9192, so keep up the good work –  Ivo Flipse Mar 12 '11 at 12:58
    
@Ivo Flipse: Why do you think I'm proposing new badges? ;P And thanks, I'll keep flagging of course. :) –  Time Traveling Bobby Mar 12 '11 at 15:28
1  
Are there any stats on how many people are >=700 and >=749? –  marcog Mar 13 '11 at 19:06
    
@marcog: On SO 75 people have the Deputy-Badge, on SU 9, SF 5. I'd guess it's well under 25 people on all three sites. –  Time Traveling Bobby Mar 13 '11 at 19:37
2  
@marcog: @Bobby: Yesterday there were probably quite a few that were >749, but after Marc's flag weight calculation fix I wouldn't be surprised if there aren't anyone over 700 even. I deleted my answer since after that fix it wasn't relevant any longer. –  ho1 Mar 14 '11 at 10:27
    
@ho1 Oh, that would explain the big drop in my flag weight. I'm hovering around 660 and if I'm not mistaken 14 valid flags will push me over 700. But it's not easy keeping it above 700 as you an 83% success rate (I think). –  marcog Mar 14 '11 at 10:45
    
@marcog: See: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/83084/… –  Time Traveling Bobby Mar 14 '11 at 11:36
    
And, implemented just a few hours before the bounty expired. –  agf Aug 22 '11 at 10:11

5 Answers 5

up vote 40 down vote accepted
+100

How about

enter image description here

for the gold badge?

I'd suggest that the level for the gold badge be tuned to require a similar effort to the existing 'Copy Editor' badge.

share|improve this answer
    
Perhaps, with the current asyptotic growth after 500, a gold Marshal (perhaps has too many military connotations?) or Sheriff badge around 650 would make sense? I think this is comparable to the difficulty of getting "Copy Editor". –  agf Aug 16 '11 at 9:27
    
@agf: The growth isn't asymptotic. You need 536 valid flags to get from flag weight 500 to flag weight 750 (formula being used). Which is an effort worth a gold badge IMHO - getting to 650 is relatively simple on the other hand. –  Wladimir Palant Aug 19 '11 at 18:10
    
My mistake; I'd read differently. –  agf Aug 19 '11 at 18:17
    
@martin Unless I'm much mistaken, this has been implemented today. –  razlebe Aug 22 '11 at 7:59

The problem is that any 10K+ can get as much flag weight as they want just by “reflagging” items in the flag queue. (10K+ users can see the flag queue)

So any badge should only be rewarded based on being the first person to flag an item.

share|improve this answer
    
One still has to get it right, i.e. not reflag anything what a moderator decides otherwise. –  Paŭlo Ebermann Aug 15 '11 at 13:12
    
@Paule, getting it right takes very look time, the effert is tracking down the problem to be flagged. Just find 1 in 5 items in the flag queue you know are correcly flagged and watch your flag rating go up fast. –  Ian Ringrose Aug 16 '11 at 9:18
2  
I did this as soon as I reached 10k. Which lead to the question Which actions using the 10k-moderator-tools do really help the diamond moderators?. You are right, the time-consuming part is finding new items - this should get a larger influence on badges and/or flag-weight. –  Paŭlo Ebermann Aug 16 '11 at 13:20

My suggestion for a gold badge based on flag weight is that it involves sustaining a very high flag weight for a span of time or span of flags. i.e.

flagged X posts while maintaining a flag weight of at least Y

I'd say "flagged 100 posts while staying above 725" would be good starting point.

share|improve this answer
    
I would include time in it as well, so flags at least 20 posts a month for 6 months while maintaining a flag weight of at least Y –  Ian Ringrose Mar 12 '11 at 13:20
2  
@Ian if the number of flags per month is high enough, simply multiply it with 6 months, given the flaggers some room for going on a vacation for instance –  Ivo Flipse Mar 12 '11 at 15:52

I propose a variation on this:

  • Make Deputy bronze
    • Solves the "Two badges higher than silver" problem

  • Lower Deputy requirement to 250 FW
    • Fits better with bronze

  • Make Sheriff requirement 500 FW
    • Makes the distance between the 3 rungs 250-250 instead of 200-50

  • Rename "Clint Eastwood"
    • Not everyone is going to know who Clint Eastwood is.
share|improve this answer
5  
250 still sounds a little much for a bronze badge... you already get a bronze badge by raising just one flag. –  BoltClock's a Unicorn Mar 12 '11 at 5:37
3  
who is this Clint Eastwood you speak of? –  Benny Mar 12 '11 at 5:47
    
@Bolt: Yeah, I thought about that, but this was the only way I could think of to fit two more badges above Deputy. –  John Mar 12 '11 at 16:37

? Pah. Give me . He seems to have a knack for flagging things. Tagging even.

Look at Jeff's comment against this question http://meta.stackexchange.com/q/82538/156011

I think he is far more recognizable as an enforce (good or bad) on SE than Clint who?


For those who have an issue with using [tag:] for styling, please, take your comments and put in a request for [badge:]

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .