Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 155 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Possible Duplicate:
Remove trivial edit restriction

Basically, in this answer, I made a spelling mistake.

The user was good enough to spot it and even tried to edit but couldn't.

As they will require approval anyway, is there a need to have a minimum length/changes?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by waiwai933, Michael Mrozek, ChrisF, Shog9, William Hilsum Mar 13 '11 at 0:47

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

As they will require approval anyway, is there a need to have a minimum length/changes?

This is exactly the reason for the length requirement; the theory is having no requirement will lead to sites getting flooded with single-character changes, which then need a second (and possibly third) person to review, all for a single character. I'm not convinced that would actually happen, but that's the reason for the length restriction

share|improve this answer
It already happens... I mean, edits that don't go far enough. I suppose it's not guaranteed that allowing shorter edits would increase the quantity of these, but it does give us a good opportunity to get on our soapboxes and push for more editing... – Shog9 Mar 13 '11 at 0:48
@Shog9 Lots of current edits suck, but I don't think that has anything to do with the limit – Michael Mrozek Mar 13 '11 at 1:02

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .