What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 133 Stack Exchange communities.

Possible Duplicate:
Remove trivial edit restriction

Basically, in this answer, I made a spelling mistake.

The user was good enough to spot it and even tried to edit but couldn't.

As they will require approval anyway, is there a need to have a minimum length/changes?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by waiwai933, Michael Mrozek, ChrisF, Shog9, William Hilsum Mar 13 '11 at 0:47

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

1 Answer 1

As they will require approval anyway, is there a need to have a minimum length/changes?

This is exactly the reason for the length requirement; the theory is having no requirement will lead to sites getting flooded with single-character changes, which then need a second (and possibly third) person to review, all for a single character. I'm not convinced that would actually happen, but that's the reason for the length restriction

share|improve this answer
    
It already happens... I mean, edits that don't go far enough. I suppose it's not guaranteed that allowing shorter edits would increase the quantity of these, but it does give us a good opportunity to get on our soapboxes and push for more editing... –  Shog9 Mar 13 '11 at 0:48
1  
@Shog9 Lots of current edits suck, but I don't think that has anything to do with the limit –  Michael Mrozek Mar 13 '11 at 1:02

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .