Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

We've been told the flag weight formula above 500 has an asymptote of 750. What exactly is the formula being used though?

share|improve this question
up vote 17 down vote accepted

I'm not sure the exact formula is particularly helpful, but the usual increase (10, 5, whatever) is multiplied by the exponent (of 10) of some negative number, calculated as the difference between your current weight and 500, along with some scaling factor. Such that at 500 you get full points (10^0 == 1), with that dropping fairly swiftly after that.

There is nothing particularly scientific about that, other than it gives the shape we were looking for. I can recall that it would take 1072 correct flags with none incorrect to get to something like 749.5. But getting 700+ is sooner (you flagging-crazy fiends know who you are!).

"How much to reach x" is probably unanswerable except with "from y, assuming no flags get bounced". Re % (comments); that isn't something we can directly report at the moment.

Since computers do lots of rounding, for all I know it might be possible to hit 750.00; but there is a hard max - even if the maths goes wobbly through rounding error, you cannot exceed 750.

share|improve this answer
Oh, "how much to reach x" also depends on which types of flags – Marc Gravell Mar 17 '11 at 9:32
@Richard - that would probably not be well received. I recommend against it. – Marc Gravell Mar 17 '11 at 10:21
@Richard - I mean: well-received by maths.SE - that isn't the type of question they crave – Marc Gravell Mar 17 '11 at 10:27
you flagging-crazy fiends know who you are! - Are you suggesting that level of flagging is frowned upon? Yes, my flag weight is >700. – marcog Mar 17 '11 at 10:29
@marcog the exact opposite; they are good and correct flags, and do nothing but improve the site. Bring it on! – Marc Gravell Mar 17 '11 at 10:41
@Marc Good to know :) – marcog Mar 17 '11 at 11:22

It is not super-linear, it is asymptotic

@Mehrdad - asymptotic, but not logarithmic – Marc Gravell♦ Mar 10 at 7:27

Under this answer

The formula is.. well, to be a true asymptote, it must use something like TAN() or an inverted (1/x) series. Plug your own numbers and you can't go far from the truth.

You will never reach 750, for that is the definition of Asymptote


Except.. when it is not and asymptote. See here: It appears flag weight ALWAYS goes up by at least 0.1, right up to 750.

share|improve this answer
Got the wrong terminology, removed super-linear from the question (still the same question). I want to know how many valid flags I need to reach a flag weight of X, as well as have a sense of what percentage of my flags are being marked valid/invalid. – marcog Mar 17 '11 at 8:20
Computers do rounding; on a computer you probably can reach it... eventually. – Marc Gravell Mar 17 '11 at 9:15
@Marc: Sorry to keep nagging, but this has nothing to do with rounding. – Hendrik Vogt Aug 22 '11 at 14:42

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .