What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 128 Stack Exchange communities.

Possible Duplicate:
Eeeek! Why is StackOverflow naked?

UPDATE

Didn't notice the Eeeek! Why is StackOverflow naked? post. That's so much more informative and alive!

StackOverflow, bring back the old colors! Please! Now!


On StackOverflow, Previously, the "0 Answers" was white text on a maroon background. Now it's maroon text on white background.

Is it just me or does anyone else find the new scheme a eye strain?

enter image description here

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Shog9, gnostradamus, Yi Jiang, jmfsg, ChrisF Mar 17 '11 at 21:40

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

2  
There are others who also lack an appreciation of bare, jaundiced skin. See: Eeeek! Why is StackOverflow naked? –  Shog9 Mar 17 '11 at 21:29
    
Here's your solution: stackapps.com/questions/2222/… –  Andrew Moore Mar 17 '11 at 21:30
add comment

1 Answer 1

I personally love it. I didn't care for the older blocky styling.

share|improve this answer
    
I like that "blocky" styling for the 0 answers because it makes it stand out. Accepted Answer - green background; No Accepted Answer "no" background; and No Answers - maroon background. Make so much sense! –  Zabba Mar 17 '11 at 21:38
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .