Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

If I see an answer that involves some illegal activity, such as breaking license agreements, should I then mark this as Offensive or should I simply down-vote it?

share|improve this question

migrated from Jul 23 '09 at 13:48

This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.

Got an example? – tomjedrz Aug 27 '09 at 14:52
Have we completely forgotten the distinction between criminal and civil law? If breaking a contract constitutes "illegal activity" as far as the rest of society is concerned, then who's to say breaking a serious promise (a verbal contract perhaps) isn't "illegal"? Leave it to the parties to the agreement. – user144913 Mar 20 '10 at 21:39
up vote 83 down vote accepted

I would be very conservative with that, as not all people on SE are from the same country and laws can be very diverse. I would comment on the answer that it breaks these [laws] in [country].

share|improve this answer

There are some perfectly legal things which people may rightly be offended by, and totally illegal things which offend very few.

It may sound trite, but I'd mark it as "offensive" if it offended me. If it didn't, I wouldn't.

It doesn't do any harm to let someone know that their post - even though not illegal - causes offense to others.

share|improve this answer

Unless it's really, really, really blatant that what they're doing is illegal, I'd say no.

share|improve this answer

You mean, like an answer that suggests downloading a piece of "abandonware" -- something that is copyrighted, but no longer legally available?

Or discussions of breaking DRM, conscientious objection, and the like?

There are grey areas.

share|improve this answer
Even breaking DRM isn't illegal everywhere. – Georg Schölly Feb 21 '10 at 9:07
Conscientious objection isn't illegal in most places, either. That was pretty much my point. – Michael Paulukonis Jul 17 '10 at 19:32
wow. downvoted after 4 years.... Somebody doesn't like grey areas. Let me be more explicit: your illegal activity is not illegal everywhere. F'r instance, if you are reading SO in Iram [made-up country] and an answer talks about using Twitterm [made-up service] -- will you downvote because use of Twitterm is illegal in your local jurisdiction? – Michael Paulukonis Dec 4 '13 at 20:32

Why would you want to mark it as something other than what it is? If it's a concern, add an option to mark it "Involves illegal activity".

share|improve this answer
Good idea. I think a new level of granularity with report functions is the appropriate solution. – Daddy Warbox Jan 14 '09 at 14:30

Only if it offends you. That's really the test for offensive - does it offend you?

Marking something as offensive doesn't remove it instantly or anything, so there's no harm done if you mark something as offensive and you're the only one offended.

share|improve this answer

Mark as offensive and downvote I suggest?

And also users with more power should be able to "censor" or delete the post.

share|improve this answer
People with greater than 10k rep can delete a closed topic. – Jason Baker Jan 14 '09 at 14:12

Copyright circumvention is a grey area, as many nations' copyright laws are ridiculous and ineffective. However, DDoS attacks or breaches of privacy are not.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .