What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 133 Stack Exchange communities.

Possible Duplicate:
Is there a way to see who both up/down voted your answer/question?

I think we should have right to know that which user voted up and voted down.

So, is there any way so get to know that which user voted up and down our question and answer?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by balpha Mar 31 '11 at 9:21

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

    
Why do you care? –  Cody Gray Mar 31 '11 at 7:22
6  
@Cody So I can go to the *****er's house and whoop his ass! –  Pëkka Mar 31 '11 at 8:05
    
@Pekka - my thoughts exactly =) On an entirely unrelated note, I feel your "Location" in your profile should be "Under the Bridge", isn't that where all trolls live? ;-) –  Rob Mar 31 '11 at 8:07
    
@Rob good point! Updated. –  Pëkka Mar 31 '11 at 8:11

2 Answers 2

NO. There is no way to know which user up/downvoted you on SE sites.

There have been lot of requests on this regard, but keeping the up/down votes anonymous is the best choice for the SE sites. This would keep the emotions like favourism and hatred as far as possible from the site. Also this is about upvoting the questions and answers, and not concerned with users. So you should really not bother about WHO voted you, rather check WHY.

share|improve this answer

No, no, no and no. Allowing people to see who has upvoted/downvoted their questions/answers adds no value to the site. When I'm reading a post regarding a feature request on meta.stackoverflow and considering whether it's good or bad, I consider the following:

  • Would the feature improve the quality of questions asked?
  • Would the feature improve the quality of answers asked?
  • Would the feature improve the user experience?

I can't see a way that this would be a yes to the first two, and only tenuously a yes to the final point and then only because it would allow users to easily discover patterns of "malicious" downvoting. Remember, votes should be given (either up or down) based on the quality of the question/answer, not because of who posted the question/answer (unless it's a question/answer from Jon Skeet ;-). The last bit wasn't meant seriously, by the way :)

In other words, the only possible use I can see for this is to allow users to easily detect patterns of abuse in votes that a given user has been making. There are at least two mechanisms in play for this to be resolved already:

  1. Automated processes that detect patterns of abuse (targeted up-voting and targeted down-voting) and cancel the votes.
  2. The facility to mail team@stackoverflow.com / flag for moderator attention if a user believes they're the target of serial up/down voting to request its review.

Therefore, there's really no "added value" to the site in providing this feature.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .