What is the policy for the following scenario?
I just saw the following answer posted: utf8_unicode_ci vs utf8_general_ci collation differences?
This is a good answer to the question: it details exactly what the differences that the OP wanted to know, clearly and in detail. Ordinarily, I would expect it to score highly.
However, I notice that the question is several months old and already has an accepted answer. Plus, although the accepted answer doesn't give the same detail, it does include a link to a site that does.
So I got a bit curious... and a quick trip to Google revealed that in fact, the user who posted this new answer had already posted the identical answer some time ago on another question: What's the difference between utf8_general_ci and utf8_unicode_ci
It is identical: exact copy and paste. But it's also by the same author, so I guess it doesn't break any plaguarism rules on that score. But it still feels like it's just a slightly cynical grab for points (and possibly also for a Necromancer badge).