Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 153 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I know that there is already a badge for hitting the voting cap for a single day (Suffrage), but could we add in a few new badges for hitting the cap for multiple days, much like the reputation cap? Thanks.

Note, this is NOT for hitting the reputation cap. I already know that badges exist for hitting the reputation cap, but there's nothing for hitting the vote cap more than once, so far as I can tell.

share|improve this question
up vote 10 down vote accepted

It's actually pretty easy to cast all your votes in a day. It would be too easy to game badges like this by indiscriminate upvoting. Admittedly, the existing Suffrage badge could be easily gamed, but it really serves as a way to get new users interested and familiar with voting, since it's a key part of what makes this community work.

Besides, there are actually quite a few badges earned for voting already:

share|improve this answer
    
Red Unicorn approves. – mmyers Apr 1 '11 at 21:00

Perhaps an alternative to this would be a "GroupThink" badge (name taken from @mattdm), given to the first person to vote on an answer or question that received XX votes, where XX is something around 10-25?

share|improve this answer

I think too many badges for hitting the rep cap encourages indiscriminate voting. And we've already got Civic Duty and Electorate.

I'd rather see a few more targeted badges to encourage voting. Perhaps something for voting on 10/50/150 questions with tags which you have a high score in, for example. Not your own, of course.

That'd encourage people to vote in their areas of expertise.

share|improve this answer
    
Sounds kind of like Sportsmanship. ;) – gnostradamus Apr 1 '11 at 19:59
    
@gnostradamus — yes, but more broad. Plus, with Sportsmanship, you might provide terrible answers and then vote up the good ones. – mattdm Apr 1 '11 at 20:05
    
Providing terrible answers will get you downvoted, so people aren't likely to do that – Gabe Apr 1 '11 at 20:09
    
You need to earn at least one upvote for your answer, so terrible probably won't cut it. – gnostradamus Apr 1 '11 at 20:09
    
Well, mediocre answers, then. That's pretty easy to do. I didn't necessarily mean as a malicious/gaming-the-system tactic. Sportsmanship is kind of a "while I'm at it, vote up the other answers" badge. – mattdm Apr 1 '11 at 20:10

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .