Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I'm fairly happy with the collider dropdown, and I find myself not missing the old responses page. The new reputation page works great, and is a huge improvement. Overall, great job!

The only thing whose point I don't really get is the numeric "reputation/revisions/favourites" overview in the dropdown. enter image description here

Why is this information here? What purpose does it serve?

The weekly and monthly reputation can be checked out on the stats page; I don't think the information is important enough to take up valuable drop-down real estate. Why do I need to know how many revisions I have had this month?

Why not make it just one line:

enter image description here

Seeing more recent responses there, or a tail view of the stats in the new reputation page, would put the space to much better use.

share|improve this question
@Pekka: Yah, I did misunderstand initially - forgive me. ;) ...and, hm, maybe. I generally make my way to the activity page to go through stuff, so these notices are just a little driver over there really. – Grant Thomas Apr 10 '11 at 11:08
@Mr I added a sketch showing what I think it should look like. – Pëkka Apr 10 '11 at 11:19
I agree; more recent responses would be far more useful than weekly and monthly totals. There's already a perfectly well-designed interface for that. – Cody Gray Apr 10 '11 at 11:30
@Pekka, On seeing that, it could be even more concise as an informative menu? Granted this isn't on one line, however, is the number of activity links fixed? If so, there can be a fixed width and max-height. – Grant Thomas Apr 10 '11 at 11:51
@MrDisappointment: That makes it more concise horizontally, whereas Pekka's example makes it more concise vertically. As far as I can tell, that's the only difference between the two suggestions. I prefer vertical concision, as it allows even more recent responses to be listed. – Cody Gray Apr 10 '11 at 13:20
@Cody, I see what you're saying, that's why I wondered if there was a maximum number of displayed responses - isn't there? Also, I'm not trying to push my suggestion either, just giving input. :) – Grant Thomas Apr 10 '11 at 13:42
@Pekka, just a side remark: For me, your post shows that the automatic dummy text "enter image description here" is a bad idea :-) (I always delete it by default). – Hendrik Vogt Apr 12 '11 at 11:45
@Hendrik ah, fair enough! I never add an image description, I'll try to pay attention to that in the future. – Pëkka Apr 12 '11 at 11:51
@Pekka's - I think you're looking at the interface from only a daily user's point of view, many of our users don't visit every day, especially on the smaller sites. – Nick Craver May 24 '11 at 12:11

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .