Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

The tag 'free' on stackoverflow is used with very different semantics:

  • The Standard C free() function to deallocate memory
  • Free software, books, ...
  • Other uses I may have overlooked

What is the procedure to disambugate these?

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Gilles, mhlester, gnat, Shadow Wizard, 3ventic May 12 '14 at 22:38

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – Gilles, mhlester, gnat, Shadow Wizard, 3ventic
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

up vote 1 down vote accepted

We could change tags for the second usage of free to free-as-in-beer. ;)

On a more serious note, we could start employing a gratis tag to cover the second case, but how many users are actually going to use it, or search for it, or even understand it? The tag free is a more natural tag to use, and yes, this means that there will be some ambiguity because there are other meanings (like the free() function, etc.).

I don't know that there is any good way or pressing need to disambiguate the different uses. Users can just focus on the question title or the other 4 (potential) tags on the question to figure out which free the question is about.

share|improve this answer
The only issue with leaving it ambiguous is what to write in the tag wiki. That feature increases the importance of getting tags down to single meanings. 'Course, I don't intend to write that wiki, so it's all the same to me. – dmckee Apr 14 '11 at 23:48
@dmckee: I guess you could just add both uses to the tag wiki. – gnostradamus Apr 15 '11 at 0:15

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .