Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I had a suggestion about the number of votes a user is allotted per day. Most of the time, 30 is plenty, but there have been occasions where I've gone through a lot of threads and run out rather quickly.

I wonder if there is some way to tie the number of votes to the number of threads that you've read (defining "read" by using some yet to be determined mechanism).

Just a thought...

share|improve this question
up vote 5 down vote accepted

This doesn't make sense in my opinion: My straightforward method of abuse would be to open a few hundred threads in different tabs and wait the required time.

share|improve this answer
Could you think of another mechanism to thwart such abuse? Also, I would think that would take a lot of work to open up all of those tabs unless you used some type of script. – jonsca Apr 15 '11 at 11:57
@jonsca: I have no idea how to test if someone read something, definitely not. I guess I could make a lot of money if I had. (And even without a script there's no problem to open 100 tabs in about a minute - use middle mouse click.) – Hendrik Vogt Apr 15 '11 at 12:01
I've decided to redact my specification for the mechanism by which the system would accomplish this. – jonsca Apr 15 '11 at 12:25

Limiting votes/day is also a way to keep people from becoming too wrapped up in StackExchange. Voting well takes time (trust me, I know!) unless you blindly click and vote up. Running out of votes is a good sign that you've read enough questions for one day.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .