Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Title: The [none] tag should not disable pretty printing

I just noticed that questions tagged with disables normal pretty printing in the question as if applying lang-none to the code blocks. Apparently it's given higher precedence than some tags. Questions also tagged python will have no pretty printing using lang-none. While having both c++ and python will have lang-default (I guess it invoked the rule applying lang-default when multiple non-none known tags could be applied).

Could it be set to where the tag doesn't apply anything and just have the default settings?

or at the very least,

Give it the lowest precedence over all tags.

After much deliberation, perhaps it would be better to just request a ban on the tag as it's a contextual tag and useless on its own.

share|improve this question
Why is there a [none] tag at all? What purpose does it serve? The questions mostly seem to revolve around "none" being a text string outputted by code or a language keyword, which, if valid, would make tags like [the] and [true] valid as well. – user149432 Apr 15 '11 at 19:42
It appears to be used for questions that deal with the display: none CSS property, too. But its impact is pretty limited; there are only 33 total [none] questions. (@Mark) – Pops Apr 15 '11 at 19:46
@Mark: Frankly it doesn't have any purpose other than people just adding it because they can. New askers often write in the tag line some phrase that relates to their problem without understanding what the tags do. Those who have the ability to make new tags introduce these and it sticks. I suppose we could turn this around and be a request to ban the tag all together since it doesn't work alone, but there's only a few questions tagged (a ban on a rarely used tag seems like overkill to me). But if that's something the team wouldn't mind doing, then I'm all for it. – Jeff Mercado Apr 15 '11 at 19:54
if the two choices are to change the syntax highlighting logic for a little used tag that's used incorrectly or to blacklist a little used tag that's used incorrectly, the blacklist is almost certainly the easier (and preferable) of the two. – user149432 Apr 15 '11 at 20:02
@Mark: To be honest, I couldn't see any reason why we'd want this tag in particular to disable prettify. I'm not saying that putting lang-none on any tag is pointless, there might be valid uses on some tags, I just don't see why this tag needed this specifically. As I understand it, all tags default to not applying anything hence my request. – Jeff Mercado Apr 15 '11 at 21:01
up vote 4 down vote accepted

This tag has nothing to do with prettify, so the entire premise of your question is .. incorrect.

However, this tag is a very bad one and it is now burninated.

tag burninated

share|improve this answer
Just as good. I changed this request to be a blacklist one instead to reflect on the action taken. So it is no longer an issue. – Jeff Mercado Apr 16 '11 at 0:49

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .