Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Possible Duplicate:
Allow new users to vote on answers they've received

I finally figured out why I get so many 0-vote accepts (enough to get the Tenacious badge).

I never realized (though I knew at one time) that
Users with less than 15 rep can't even upvote answers to their own question.

Doesn't this just propagate the 0-vote accepts?

While I can see the logic to not letting <15 rep users vote on anything else, I can't see why they shouldn't be able to on answers to their own question.

How about we fix that?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by random Apr 23 '11 at 0:51

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

They can, however, accept an answer which is +15 (more than an upvote) and they get +2 rep.

There are a huge number of possible reputation exploits around allowing new users to vote, even "only on their own questions". Just put on your game theory hat for a minute and think like an evil user; it'd be trivial to ...

  • create two (or more) throwaway accounts
  • ask some meaningless question
  • immediately upvote answer(s) to that question
  • repeat multiple times to multiple answers on the question
  • repeat on multiple questions

You instantly have two -- or many more -- accounts that can upvote and potentially do a lot more. From scratch.

edit: you can only vote with a registered account, though you can accept with a cookie- based account. Unregistered users can never vote on anything, ever.

(Remember that accepts can only be done once, and can only be done 15 minutes after asking; there's no such limitation on votes. Accepts are also quite public in that the question owner accepts, compared to votes which are anonymous.)

share|improve this answer
Yep, and I always throw an upvote their way to help them get a leg up, but I still end up with a lot of 0-vote accepts. This last one he tried to upvote me but couldn't. – Lance Roberts Apr 23 '11 at 0:42
All Jeff's answer does is explain the method one uses to game the system; instead of upvotes, one uses accepts. – Carl Brannen Apr 23 '11 at 3:59
@carl accepts are public and one-shot per question (and, can't be accepted for 15 minutes after asking.. can only be changed 1 time per day.. etc). Votes are private and can be cast many times. – Jeff Atwood Apr 23 '11 at 4:11
maybe then it would be good to limit <15s to one upvote per day. Hmmm. Anyway, it's clear you've thought much more about this than the vast majority if the people commenting on it. – Carl Brannen Apr 23 '11 at 4:22

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .