What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 131 Stack Exchange communities.

I've noticed lately that many questions get migrated from SO to other sites or get closed for various reasons (e.g. they're duplicates or off-topic). It made me wonder how migration is possible. I assume that a request to migrate a question has to be confirmed by an admin of the target site. Is that so? Can someone share how it works?

share|improve this question
    
since the link in the bounty comment didn't get linked: meta.gis.stackexchange.com/questions/3275/…;‌​n-of-question-closure-let-you-choose-a-different –  matt wilkie Aug 23 '13 at 16:06

2 Answers 2

up vote 8 down vote accepted

Migration does not require confirmation from the target site. However, mods on the site do get to see a list of recently migrated questions.

It's entirely reasonable that a migrated question will be a dupe of an existing question on the new site. Users on the original site might not be aware of this. This process is working exactly as it should.

Other times, users on the original site may not realize that the question is not exactly on topic for the target site. In these cases the question probably doesn't belong anywhere, and will just die quietly.

share|improve this answer
7  
It would be nice if those voting to migrate at least checked the FAQ for the target site (there is a link on the dialog) to see if it was on topic, but we can't expect that to be the norm. –  ChrisF May 6 '11 at 11:58
    
It clarifies that then. Any idea why a vote/approval from the target site is not required? I would have assumed the exchange network would benefit from this.. (could be wrong, of course). –  amit May 6 '11 at 12:01
2  
@ChrisF - there's reading? Nobody said there would be reading. :( –  user27414 May 6 '11 at 12:02
    
@amit - you could suggest that. It could be that nobody ever thought of that. Or perhaps it would just make more work for mods and slow things down. But feel free to suggest it if you feel it would be an improvement. –  user27414 May 6 '11 at 12:02
    
@amit - when there were only 3 well defined sites approval wasn't an issue. Now there are many sites (21 sites launched and another 25 in beta) it might be a time to revisit this. However, I don't think it's that big an issue. –  ChrisF May 6 '11 at 12:04
    
@amit, @Jon's - the idea of migration approval has been raised before, but not formally (i.e. via a question here on Meta). –  ChrisF May 6 '11 at 12:05
2  
@ChrisF and @amit - the fact that mods can see recent migrations gives them a chance to disapprove, rather than having to approve everything. –  user27414 May 6 '11 at 12:05
    
@Jon - being a mod (on Web Apps and Programmers) I'm aware of that ;) –  ChrisF May 6 '11 at 12:06
    
@Jon , @ChrisF: the overload on the mods can be done by giving voters an ability to accept merge as well... @Jon: as a mod, what is your opinion about this? –  amit May 6 '11 at 12:14
    
@Jon: my bad, I meant @ChrisF :S –  amit May 6 '11 at 12:18
    
@amit As a mod, I don't mind so much. Migrations can be a problem if a lot of them happen in a short period of time and the questions are a bad fit for the target site, but that doesn't happen often. For the most part, the approval step isn't needed. –  Anna Lear May 6 '11 at 13:30
1  
We moderators see not just recent migrations, but all migrations, to be specific, to and from. –  Grace Note May 6 '11 at 13:32

I was about to post the following as a Question but since it would have been a near duplicate of this one I will try to phrase it as an Answer instead.

My main site is GIS Stack Exchange but I have noticed many questions perfect for it posted at Stack Overflow - about 100 for just one GIS product.

I think the best mechanism for migration would be if questions can be nominated by high rep users from either the posted or target site, and then the question nominated for migration gets reviewed by high rep users at the opposite site prior to the migration occurring.

In other words, I'd like to see more push and pull of off-topic questions to on-topic sites by facilitating easier migration via the review queues at both ends.

share|improve this answer
1  
+1 This would certainly help reduce balkanization. As it stands now, questions too easily become refugees, pushed out, left to "die quietly". –  Kirk Kuykendall Aug 7 '13 at 14:00
    
I tried adding a bounty to get some more attention and discussion on this, but it doesn't seem to have done much. It might be better to paste as new, tagged feature-request. –  matt wilkie Aug 31 '13 at 6:49
    
Thanks for trying @mattwilkie - I'll see if I can post it as a new question distinct from this one. Incidentally, I didn't know you could put a bounty on an answer so I'll have to look into how that works. –  PolyGeo Aug 31 '13 at 7:03

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .