What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 131 Stack Exchange communities.

Possible Duplicate:
Question votes not reflective of total votes on all answers to said question

Maybe I am missing something, but I am reading this thread: Why are questions not being voted on?

I am wondering, if a question is already answered, why not make up-votes to the answers give a fraction of the vote to the question? After all, if a person found the answer helpful, doesn't that mean that the question was pretty helpful too?

Maybe it doesn't need to be visibly-upvoted, but at least for the purposes of ranking that should be quite similar. What else is the question rating used for?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by random May 7 '11 at 2:04

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

4  
Because bad questions can still have good answers. –  dmckee May 7 '11 at 2:05
1  
“By this metric, 'What is Your Favorite Programming Cartoon?' is now the best question any human being has ever asked in the entirety of recorded time.” — Jeff's reply to a similar proposal in the comments on the latest blog post. –  ЯegDwight May 7 '11 at 2:06
1  
@dmckee and vice-versa! –  Jeff Atwood May 7 '11 at 8:02
    
Still doesn't answer my question which is not an exact duplicate: "What else is the question rating used for?" –  Artem May 8 '11 at 4:56

2 Answers 2

Voting on a question is feedback on the quality of the question.

Voting on an answer is feedback on the quality of the answer.

The quality of a question is not very dependent on the quality of any particular answer. Tying the two would be a mistake.

share|improve this answer
    
Can you still clarify what the votes on the question itself are used for? –  Artem May 8 '11 at 4:56
    
Also, don't you think if a question generated good answers, then it was a "good" question? For some measure of good? –  Artem May 8 '11 at 5:02

How do you propose to treat questions without answers? In that case, upvotes on the question are very important, since a higher voted question is more likely to attract people to answer it. (And similarly, downvotes help bury bad questions.)

Having answers contribute to the question score would mean that the "questions" are of high quality, which they isn't necessarily true. For example, most of the top-voted questions on Stack Overflow that have high-voted answers aren't even really questions in the first place.

share|improve this answer
    
If something is not a question, how can it have a good answer? I would then argue that those answers are not good. –  Artem May 8 '11 at 5:00
    
@Artem Generally, I agree, but they can still get upvoted, which under your system would then upvote the question. A non-question, if it's popular enough, can attract responses (even good ones) that quickly get upvoted. –  Anna Lear May 8 '11 at 5:09

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .