What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 134 Stack Exchange communities.

I lucidly remember having had cast close to 1700 downvotes last time I happened to look at the stats, a few days ago. This is a recent screenshot from this question:

enter image description here

However, the new vote stats show this:

enter image description here

what happened to them? Has there been some mass deletion?

share|improve this question
1  
Similar to the discrepancy that's recorded here in images. See my comment to waffles's answer. –  Cody Gray May 9 '11 at 12:47
1  
Have they just found the weapons of mass deletion? –  Andrew Grimm May 9 '11 at 13:00
    
+1, i'd still like to know the detail though :D –  davidsleeps May 9 '11 at 13:01
    
Might have to do something with this heavy artillery thing? –  fretje May 9 '11 at 13:04
    
Excellent, this also answers my question from a few months ago - meta.stackexchange.com/questions/86900/… –  dsolimano May 9 '11 at 14:08
    
You accepted Nick's answer, but wouldn't you actually want that score back? Especially for downvotes on deleted posts, you apparently downvoted just right! –  Arjan May 11 '11 at 16:28
    
@Arjan fair point! –  Pëkka May 11 '11 at 18:43
2  

3 Answers 3

up vote 20 down vote accepted

The old counts simply didn't care about what was deleted (the Posts they went towards), the new counts do, so you'll see the totals reflect that.

To be explicitly clear since the conspiracy theories are already rolling around:

No post/vote data was changed (no recalc, no mass deletion, etc) here, only what "counts" for votes, like most deleted things they aren't factored in these counts now.

share|improve this answer
6  
Very good, I think that's a positive change. With all the focus on the importance of votes recently, I think some of us are just watching our stats more carefully! –  Cody Gray May 9 '11 at 13:19
2  
Will future deletions now change the votes cast amount in realtime? Or does this still require some vote recalcs at some intervals? –  BalusC May 9 '11 at 17:43
3  
@Chichiray - it may not be exactly real-time (if we decide cache), but the data is not denormalized, so no recalcs, etc. are required to maintain the counts...since they're pulled from the source. –  Nick Craver May 9 '11 at 18:20
    
That's what I need to know, thanks :) –  BalusC May 9 '11 at 18:23
5  
Not saying it's wrong, but still: why? Especially for downvotes, I'd say deletions are a nice result of rightful downvotes. Hence, why not show that people apparently downvoted "correctly"? –  Arjan May 11 '11 at 16:25
    
Nick, just FYI, the 1.0 API seems to still be showing the old counts, just saw it on YiJiang's elections tool elections.stackexchange.com. Related chat conversation chat.meta.stackoverflow.com/transcript/message/986165#986165 (I don't expect this to warrant any action, just pointing it out in case it's in 2.0 too) –  Pëkka Jun 5 '12 at 9:18
    
I think this is no longer true, right? Deleted posts still count for votes? –  Ben Brocka Sep 12 '12 at 20:06

Nick / SE appear(s) to have done a 180 and now your votes are back. I suppose you're well aware of that, but this question needed an up-to-date answer :P

share|improve this answer

I'm just presuming it's a recalc of some sort...anything number wise (rep, votes) seems to get recalculated every so often...is it surprising anymore?

Perhaps the votes were on questions/answers that have been removed (or moved)?

Edit
There has been a unusually high focus on votes, the vote interface, vote rules etc etc recently...can't be a coincidence...

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .