What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 130 Stack Exchange communities.

We need a way to disable the Stack Exchange bar at the top-left of every SE site.

I'm not saying take it away. I'm saying give us the option to take it away.

It's noise IMHO. It shows me replies across all the SE sites. If I wanted to see a response, I'd hit the response tab on my user page.

After I visit the response tab, the number icon in the SE bar (top left) doesn't decrease, so I have to take one more step (clicking that bar); otherwise, later, I will think I have replies though I've already read them.

I can understand why people generally aren't having this issue. I'm having this issue because I use 11 different SE sites. If you actually use that many different SE sites, you can understand my situation.

Say if there are 10 new answers in your SuperDrowndown and you've only got time to read 3 of them right now? You'd hit that superdropdown read 3 of them and there is no indication that 7 of them are still unread. See my point now? I'm missing out my replies because I don't often have time to "clear all the replies" in 1 shot

share|improve this question
1  
why the downvotes –  Pacerier May 16 '11 at 0:06
18  
@Pacerier Because we disagree. –  muntoo May 16 '11 at 1:01
5  
This sounds like a job for... StackApps! –  Neil Fein May 16 '11 at 3:19
1  
@muntoo but do you know if you downvote me too vigorously the system will ban me from posting any more new questions/suggestions? –  Pacerier May 16 '11 at 5:52
    
@Pacerier This is the only place I've downvoted you (nothing personal, just being a good citizen). I'm sure the 8(+?) other people have a similar opinion to me. And, yes, I was aware of that. –  muntoo May 16 '11 at 5:55
1  
<s>Hmmm... It looks as if you've only 2 accounts: SO, and MSO. Perhaps you should associate the other ones? This way, everything will be "all-in-one", and you won't have this "problem". (I hope.)</s> Uhhh... –  muntoo May 16 '11 at 6:01
1  
Downvotes are different here on Meta than they are on the main site. As muntoo says, they indicate disagreement, particularly for a question tagged feature-request, rather than meaning "this is a bad question that shouldn't have ever been asked in the first place". It's unlikely you'll be banned from posting future questions on Meta just because this one has been severely downvoted. –  Cody Gray May 16 '11 at 8:12
    
@muntoo: I see 11 accounts. Pacerier had to reregister with a new account. –  Hendrik Vogt May 16 '11 at 11:52
    
    
@Hendrik: Interesting. My suspicion is that figuring out ways to get around the account ban is a really good way to get that ban reinstated with prejudice... –  Cody Gray May 16 '11 at 11:55
    
@muntoo this is the correct link stackoverflow.com/users/632951/pacerier?tab=accounts –  Pacerier May 17 '11 at 13:19
1  
@Cody Gray you apparently didn't know the reason why I was banned so what's with that judgement –  Pacerier May 17 '11 at 13:20
    
It wasn't about you in particular. You're right, I had no idea that you were even banned, and I never did and still don't know the reason. It's not really my business. My point, however, is still valid. Figuring out ways to get around the account ban is a really good way of getting that ban quickly reinstated. –  Cody Gray May 17 '11 at 13:22
1  
@Cody Gray . you apparently didn't know the reason why someone (anyone, not just me) will be banned from asking questions at all do you? –  Pacerier May 17 '11 at 18:05
1  
@Pacerier: Yes, I'm aware of the reason. I don't need to be educated; I've answered many questions about it myself. The trick is that you have to be a repeat offender. Asking one bad question isn't enough to trigger the automatic block. That's good because we all acknowledge that edge cases exist and people make mistakes. You only get "banned" from asking questions if you repeatedly ask bad questions that add nothing of value to the community. The standards are pretty rigorous, but intentionally not fully disclosed. I have a fair understanding of them, but they haven't been applicable to me. –  Cody Gray May 17 '11 at 23:29

3 Answers 3

From the TOS:

StackExchange™ MultiCollider SuperDropdown™ is property of StackExchange™. Suggestions of its removal will not be tolerated, and will result in your immediate termination.


FYI, I have 25+ accounts on SE sites, and I don't really "understand my [your] situation". (I probably only use 15+ of them, though.)


Try Adblock Plus or AdBlock, and set a custom filter, if it annoys you so much.

share|improve this answer
    
perhaps you don't have that much activity as me even though you had several more accounts compared to mine? –  Pacerier May 16 '11 at 5:51
3  
@Pacerier I find the StackExchange™ MultiCollider SuperDropdown™ very useful; it allows me to quickly check up on responses/etc with a "single" click. I'd rather not go to each SE site and go to the response page. –  muntoo May 16 '11 at 5:54
    
so what if there are 10 new answers in your SuperDrowndown and you've only got time to read 3 of them right now? You'd hit that superdropdown read 3 of them and there is no indication that 7 of them are still unread. You get it? i'm missing out my replies because I don't often have time to "clear all the replies" in 1 shot –  Pacerier May 17 '11 at 13:23
1  
@Pacerier I use my infallible memory to memorize the ones I've been to or not. A better feature-request, instead of disabling the StackExchange™ MultiCollider SuperDropdown™, would be to detect links you've clicked on (to answer/reply to/etc). –  muntoo May 17 '11 at 20:46
    
gd point but i don't think you should downvote this thread at all even if its not an upvote its fine. –  Pacerier May 18 '11 at 5:42
    
Why is a suggestion of its removal not tolerated and why does it result in a immediate termination? That's a bit harsh... –  siamii Oct 28 '11 at 13:27
    
@bizso09 You will understand the more you use StackExchange... And the more you get to know me. >:D –  muntoo Oct 28 '11 at 23:47

Oh no please! Do not take this away from me! And do not allow others to hide the notification regarding a message I sent! However it is true I would like the "responses" tab in the profile to be updated when I already read the comment or answer by using the bar. But that is a different issue.

share|improve this answer
    
I'm not saying take it away of course. I'm saying giving us the Option to take it away or put it as it is. btw i've edited the question –  Pacerier May 16 '11 at 0:07
1  
The problem I see with this is that the only "invasive" notifications we have left are precisely these ones, since email notification has been denied repetedly. If an option for disabling this is offered then it is very likely that many users will not be resposive enough about comments and answers. Even if it is just "optional". –  yms May 16 '11 at 0:42
1  
On the other hand, the issue with syncronization between the notification bar and the responses tab is indeed a bit unconfortable, maybe you sould create a new feature-request, bug-report or discussion about that specific point. Please do not blame me if you get downvoted again... meta is kind of unpredictable :) –  yms May 16 '11 at 0:47

Apply whiteout to your eyeglasses? Seriously, why not just ignore it?

share|improve this answer
    
i can. but this is just a suggestion you see. isn't meta for suggestions? –  Pacerier May 16 '11 at 5:49
1  
To get the team interested you will have to offer some better reason than 'I want it ...' something about it that is actively problematic. –  Rosinante May 16 '11 at 10:35
    
because i think applying whiteout to eyeglasses is not what an average person will do? –  Pacerier May 17 '11 at 13:24
1  
No, that's true. Most people would apply the whiteout to their monitors, rather than their eyeglasses. How silly of this answer! –  Cody Gray May 17 '11 at 23:29

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .