What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 122 Stack Exchange communities.

Currently it shows like this (a recent example)

closed as "not programming related" by RSolberg, Tim J, Rob Kennedy, Paul Alexander, Michael Petrotta an hour ago

How about it would show like this.

closed as "not programming related" by RSolberg, Tim J and as "not a real question" by Rob Kennedy, Paul Alexander, Michael Petrotta an hour ago

Or like this.

Closed as:
"not programming related" by RSolberg, Tim J
"not a real question" by Rob Kennedy, Paul Alexander, Michael Petrotta
an hour ago

share|improve this question
2  
see also meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2519/… –  Ether Dec 11 '09 at 18:20
add comment

6 Answers

up vote 9 down vote accepted

I think this would both clutter up the close-message, and lead to annoyed people wondering why Rob thought their question was not a "real question", when everyone else though it wasn't programming related..

This might happen because a user accidently clicked the wrong close message (example) - it gets averaged out and prevents arguments, I'd say..

share|improve this answer
1  
We wouldnt have this problem if the closers left comments as to the reason - which is why this is actually coming up! –  staticx Dec 11 '09 at 18:36
add comment

The current method spreads false information. It claims that all close votes were unanimously for a particular option - this is clearly not the case. In a recent question, I voted to close as "belongs on superuser.com," whereas the majority voted "not programming related." When the question was finally closed, it claimed that I, along with the others, voted to close because it was "not programming related." That is false.

share|improve this answer
3  
In the opposite case, I just closed this question, which had 3 votes for "not a real question" but I closed it as "off topic", which resulted in "closed as off topic by X, Y, Z, and Kevin". That's THREE falsehoods! –  Kevin Vermeer Jun 16 '11 at 21:17
add comment

I like the idea -- it provides full disclosure -- but would prefer to have it handled with a hover effect instead of expanding the close message. See this feature request.

share|improve this answer
    
Aye i think it's a better implementation than i suggested. Since there are many features that employ a hover effect. –  Ólafur Waage Jul 5 '09 at 13:27
add comment

Maybe the word 'mostly' could be inserted if there's more than one close reason given.

(deliberately naive code follows...)

If (NumberOfCloseReasons > 1) {
  Message = "Closed as mostly " + MainCloseReason + " by " + ListAllClosers();
} else {
  Message = "Closed as " + MainCloseReason + " by " + ListAllClosers();
}

That would mostly avoid the problem of visual clutter and overcome the 'incorrectness' of the current approach.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Does this extra information really add any value? IMHO it doesn't. Nearly all the time there's consensus on the reason too.

share|improve this answer
add comment

I would say even remove the reason from everyone except the moderators. In fact, there should be a way for moderators to filter by close reason to allow them to permanently delete or move questions that just don't belong and add 0 value to Stack Overflow.

share|improve this answer
4  
i think showing a reason is helpful to the asker, if the intent is that they learn to get better at asking questions. Also, a casual passerby can see the closed questions, see the reasons why they were closed, and learn from that example. –  Leon Bambrick Aug 24 '09 at 1:30
add comment

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .