On sites where you convert a YouTube link to an embedded player (which apparently doesn't include MSO, so I can't put an example directly in this post), can you use 16:9 aspect ratio instead of 4:3? It's much more common these days. Here's an example


How it is today

Example of 16:9 YouTube video embedded in 4:3 player.


How it could be

Example of 16:9 YouTube video embedded in 16:9 player.

share|improve this question
7  
so... why all the downvotes? –  Kip May 30 '11 at 16:02
1  
Downvotes here usually mean disagreement, so people probably don't like your proposal. –  mc10 May 30 '11 at 16:58
7  
Yeah.... not sure about the downvotes on this one? Could someone explain? (+1 so it gets back on the homepage) –  Jon Seigel May 30 '11 at 17:27
4  
Maybe they don't care for widescreen. Maybe you didn't provide a good enough reason. Maybe there's no point. Maybe widescreen isn't as common as you think for those things that are illustrated via YouTube videos. –  random May 31 '11 at 19:39
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 12 down vote accepted
+500

Starting with the next build, youtube embeds will be 640x385px (25px for the player), a 16:9 ratio.

This won't affect existing posts, since the conversion is done at the time of a save/edit. If you want a post to switch to the new format, simply edit it.

share|improve this answer
    
Woohoo! Thanks. –  Adam Davis Feb 24 '12 at 18:20
    
Sweet, thank you good sir. –  Matthew Read Feb 24 '12 at 18:43
add comment

For anyone who would like this, I wrote a Grease Monkey script to fix it. You can find it over on StackApps.

share|improve this answer
1  
Thank you for this, +1 for the script –  Maverik Aug 1 '11 at 10:54
add comment

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .