Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Now that I see the pending edits, I come across such suggested edit - since I can't know for sure that anonymous user is the author "pat1234" I've rejected the edit - what if it's just some troll?

What are other people here doing in such cases?

share|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

I don't see a problem with that your example. The question 'belongs' the the community, and the edit was making it more precise.

In this particular case, I strongly suspect that pat123 asked his question from work, then added the edit from home where he didn't have his login credentials to hand (or he's got a cookie-based login). Anyone else editing it that way would be highly unlikely, especially as the question already had an answer.

It would be slightly more suspicious if the answer had been marked as accepted, but that's not the case.

share|improve this answer
So you say I should accept such edit suggestion? – Shadow Wizard Jun 1 '11 at 12:36
@Shadow, I'd say in this case yes, especially in light of what Rob said. And more generally, I don't think I would necessarily construe edits that don't explicitly say "Edit by somebody else" as the editor 'pretending' to be the author. – Benjol Jun 1 '11 at 13:05
cheers, think I understand this much better now. Wonder if I should edit that question myself now? – Shadow Wizard Jun 1 '11 at 21:07

I see a lot of edits like this as well. Unless it's some kind of improvement like adding a link to a keyword or something like that I reject the edit.

Some of the suggests are actually new users who are mistakenly trying to ask for clarifications by editing the answer. However quite a few of them are users browsing the question and adding their opinion on the matter.

share|improve this answer

My feeling is that this situation is a difficult one with no easy "rule of thumb". If it seems quite obvious that:

  • The person adding the text is in actual fact the author
  • The added text clarifies the intent of the question in a way that makes sense
  • The "voice" used is similar for both the original question and for the addition

I'd be inclined to approve the edit. If I was in any doubt, I'd reject the edit and add a comment to the question with the meat of the edit (where posible - this would be quite hard to do for anything other than an addendum), so that it isn't lost from view as it may be genuinely useful and from the OP.

Edit: In this example, if you've over 10k reputation, you can see that there's a deleted answer from another user named "pat1234", sharing the same auto-generated gravatar (id: 777758 - as opposed to the OP who is id: 777658) which would suggest that the OP is genuinely unfamiliar with how Stack Overflow works and is thus quite likely to not have a handle on creating their account properly.

This only serves to reinforce the "theres no rule of thumb" point as context is everything with something like this.

share|improve this answer
Cheers, didn't notice the deleted answer! – Shadow Wizard Jun 1 '11 at 12:39
@Shadow, it's doubly unfortunate that the OP has managed to get two IDs that are precisely one hundred apart, it was only the difference in reputation between them that highlighted it to me! – Rob Jun 1 '11 at 12:41
more luck than wits.. all good! :-) – Shadow Wizard Jun 1 '11 at 20:54

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .