Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Possible Duplicate:
What can I do when getting “It does not meet our quality standards”?

I ask because I cant post this question:

The implementation of sqlite for web doesnt come with encryption, so the basic question is how do I protect (encrypt) my database information on the client side and still be usable like a normal sql database?

On the other case compile the sqlite-version encrypted.... but, I should find a "better way" for let my wepapp embeded on iOS know the info in a 2-way fashion.

So how can I keep safe the information in the database?

I have added tags.

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by gnostradamus, Grace Note, Robert Harvey Jun 8 '11 at 16:57

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

Which error message are you getting? Is it "This question does not meet our quality standards," or is it "Sorry we are no longer accepting questions from this account"? – Robert Harvey Jun 8 '11 at 16:54
@Robert Considering the title says "quality standars" [sic], I'm kinda in the impression that gnostra is in. – Grace Note Jun 8 '11 at 16:56
@Grace: Ah. Sorry, I tend to filter out mispeld [sic] words. – Robert Harvey Jun 8 '11 at 16:56
Run your question through a grammar and spell checker, check your capitalization, and try submitting your question again. – Robert Harvey Jun 8 '11 at 17:00
What was the question's title? – Pëkka Jun 8 '11 at 18:28

Well, I'm sure spelling and punctuation are part of the quality standards. For example:

  • doesnt -> doesn't
  • wepapp -> web application
  • embeded -> embedded
share|improve this answer
And yet, it appears no worse than many questions I've seen just today. – mmyers Jun 8 '11 at 16:58
The second paragraph, "On the other case ...", is almost incomprehensible. – Peter Mortensen Jun 8 '11 at 23:04
I see, I was thinking that it is best if stackoverflow give a separate "app/editor" for let foreign people to test their grammar... and have "compile errors" because like you have see, my impression was that my question was stupid instead of unreadable or with bad grammar. You know, error messages in a program should inform the user of what is happening, not a "general error fault" like "your post doesn't meet our quality standards", I think if this program do those checks, is best if they give more useful information so one can use that information and don't come here asking why I can't post – tyoc213 Jul 22 '11 at 16:36
@tyoc213: The official answer is that if the system told you how to avoid the filter, you might be able to bypass it. This is called a Catch-22. – Jon Ericson Jan 13 '12 at 23:31

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .