Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Can we give the moderation at the "language-design" tag a lighter touch than with posts with other tags? Otherwise, I fear that any discussion that tries to introduce innovation will just be shut down as "vague" or "argumentative" before it has a chance to gain traction.

Example, some weeks ago there was an "Alternative SQL" post, using that tag, was very quickly shut down. It started off sounding like a rant( relational model=good, SQL=bad, one i've seen before), but what if , in the second entry, he had made a proposal on a different query syntax, with pros and cons compared to SQL. But there was no second entry, because he got shut down.

Given the way this moderation works, if a fellow posted on the Perl tag, "Hi, I'm Guido, I've got a new language that's a lot like Perl, but easier to read, ... thinking of calling it Python" , the Perl moderators would have shut it down as fast as possible.

Making it worse, some of the posts that are shut down are being deleted from the stackoverflow database altogether, they are just erased (although this does not appear to be the case with the Alternative SQL post in april/may, otherwise I wouldn't know it exists).

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by ᔕᖺᘎᕊ, rene, James, Fish Below the Ice, Werner Oct 29 '15 at 18:16

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – ᔕᖺᘎᕊ, rene, James, Fish Below the Ice, Werner
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Relevant: Language design questions on SO. – hammar Jun 11 '11 at 22:17
I don't understand what you mean by "second entry"? Why not ask a proper question in the first place? (That's not to say that these kinds of questions don't have it tough on SO. But it may simply not be the ideal place for them.) – Pëkka Jun 11 '11 at 22:18
Presumable this is in reference to: Alternative SQL Dialect? Seems to be an invitation to discussion, no? – dmckee Jun 11 '11 at 23:20
While I don't understand other's problems with rants (sometimes you just have to rant), I would think that those kind of questions would belong better on Programmers. – Lance Roberts Jun 12 '11 at 3:21

Can we give the moderation at the "language-design" tag a lighter touch than with posts with other tags?

No, we shouldn't give special treatment to specific tags. If someone can't communicate their ideas effectively without ranting, then I doubt they're going to give us the next Python. If they absolutely need to rant in order to create something great, then I'm okay with them ranting somewhere else.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .