Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Back before I achieved my lifelong goal of 2000 rep on SO, when I made an edit to a post, I could still see the edited version before it was officially approved. This was nice. Especially with code dumps like this: Crash log analysis. It made an otherwise unintelligible post suddenly readable.

Now that I have over 2000 rep and all the responsibilities that come with my new found editing power, I can approve (or disapprove) edits of aspiring SO users. Usually I approve. Especially in code dump cases. Sadly, my new powers are limited and it takes 2 approval votes for the suggested edits to come through. Meanwhile, after I approve a much needed edit that I would otherwise have done myself (but who I am to deny the aspiring editor his 2 points?), I have to look at the garbled mess of a question. Yuck.

May we please get to see the question as edited once we approve the edit?

share|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

I always click Improve in this case.

As far as I know, this still awards the 2 rep to the editor.

share|improve this answer
Interesting way to skirt the problem. Thanks for this. – PengOne Jun 13 '11 at 18:49
@PengOne Looks like that won't do anymore. Oops! Your edit couldn't be submitted because: •You seem to be improving a post however, you made no changes. – GSerg Jun 24 '11 at 22:31
Yes, I realized that a couple of days ago. Now I just make a silly change. Rather pointless, really. Oh well. – PengOne Jun 24 '11 at 22:36

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .