Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I'm the first to admit, I'm an asker, not an answerer. I totally get that you want pearls, and that's fine.

But this trend has me thinking - will you ever decide that because answers are so much more important than questions, questions upvotes should generate zero rep gain? And then perhaps do a rep recalc?

share|improve this question
Don't forget that (most) askers will turn into answerers sooner or later. – Toon Krijthe Jun 14 '11 at 19:06
@Gamecat: Ahem... – Lorem Ipsum Jun 22 '11 at 14:24

I certainly hope not. Reputation is awarded for contributing to the community, and the community is enriched both by good answers and by good questions. Both should be encouraged.

share|improve this answer

My crystal ball says.....


share|improve this answer
Nice, a talking crystal ball. – Toon Krijthe Jun 14 '11 at 19:05
I'm looking into my magic 8-ball but it's just black. – mmyers Jun 14 '11 at 20:28
this post is flagged as low-quality – Brian Jun 15 '11 at 17:46

I don't think it would be a good thing to not award rep for a well written question. Assuming that people are upvoting well written, interesting questions and not upvoting poorly asked questions, the people who take the time to ask good questions deserve the rep.

share|improve this answer

A rep recalc is definitely not going to happen because such a thing would punish people who earned reputation by asking good questions - this discourages participation in the community and is only justified in really drastic cases (e.g. if somebody inflated his reputation score by using a bug in the system). Whatever reputation you gained is yours now, it cannot be taken from you retroactively.

I can imagine the question score to be lowered even further however, particularly for people with many questions and no answers. After all, the system is supposed to encourage people take their new knowledge and give it back. But I don't see it ever dropping to zero - there really are good and bad questions and the former need to be encouraged somehow. Not to mention encouraging people asking good questions to stay with the community even if they don't have enough experience to answer questions yet.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .