Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 153 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

If I've voted for a spam question to be closed, should it still be flagged for a moderator as spam?

I figured that, regardless of the closed or open status of a question, the site/mods should be made aware of problematic account, but if it is redundant to do so, I'll let you save that spot in the flag queue for something else.

I looked around for duplicates but most of them centered around flagging questions that weren't going to make it to 5 close votes or the closing reason of "spam" that "has ceased to be."

share|improve this question
up vote 10 down vote accepted

You should always flag spam.

All other actions as are entirely optional. For example, voting to close a spam question (assuming you've already flagged it!) isn't going to do any harm, but probably won't achieve much either (unless the question ultimately isn't spam, but just off-topic, in which case you might still help close it).

But, just taking secondary actions (like closing) without flagging will potentially slow-down the removal of the offending content.


And, in case you are not aware, after receiving 3 spam flags a post is removed from the front page, and after receiving 6 users flag something as spam it is automatically incinerated - zero moderator intervention required.

For further information see the page How does the spam flag work.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks. I didn't know about the removal from the front page after 3, but I knew about the 6 flags consequence. – jonsca Jun 22 '11 at 11:07

Spam should not be closed, it should be deleted. If a post accumulates enough spam flags it is automatically deleted and the owner gets -100 reputation. A moderator can accelerate the process, but the community can delete questions on its own.

If a user repeatedly posts spam, you can additionally flag for moderator attention (using the free-form flag). Usually the spam flags are enough to get the attention of a mod, but if there is a pattern some more explanation might be helpful.

share|improve this answer
    
A good point about the free-form flag (something ate my other comment). – jonsca Jun 22 '11 at 11:15

If enough number of people flag a post as spam - the post gets deleted and a -100 rep penalty is imposed. That doesn't happen if you vote to close.

If a post is spam - flag it as so.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .