Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 155 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates
20  
Is that... is that a freehand unicorn? If you traced it, cool, but if it's freehand, hats off to you, sir or madam. – Pops Jun 27 '11 at 16:44
    
Browser info? No repro on Win7 FF 3.6.18. – Jon Seigel Jun 27 '11 at 16:46
3  
Win7/Chrome version 9999 or whatever the latest is (13 today). Also happens on Win7/IE9. – bkaid Jun 27 '11 at 16:48
    
Repro Win7 x64/Chrome 10 (my work proxy keeps it from updating, YAY) – user7116 Jun 27 '11 at 16:57
    
What do unicorns have to do with extra long links included in the post body? – random Jun 27 '11 at 17:07
11  
@random If you have to ask, we can't possibly express it in a way that would help you understand the connection. I suggest meditating. – Adam Davis Jun 27 '11 at 17:22
    
@Adam Davis - thanks for teaching me that "EEEEEK" has 5 E's. I wasn't entirely sure and guessed wrong. A case of RTFM for me, sorry. – bkaid Jun 27 '11 at 17:55
    
status-declined coming in 3..2...1... – staticx Jun 27 '11 at 18:03
2  
@Off Actually, I could be wrong. According to the meme page, it should be four: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19478/the-many-memes-of-meta/… – Adam Davis Jun 27 '11 at 18:04
up vote 2 down vote accepted

I have put in a fix. We had word-wrap:break-word; on <p> only, now I've applied it to the whole post body text.

This fix caused more problems than it solved, so it's backed out for now; we'll add a better fix.

share|improve this answer
    
@TomWij the fix is on dev. it will be in the next production build. (later tonight EST most likely) – Jin Jun 27 '11 at 21:29
    
I think this change makes code blocks wrap very ugly in Webkit browsers. Can you confirm that? – deceze Jun 28 '11 at 9:44

Please add your results if they are not already shown below:

Firefox - OK

  • NO REPRO - 7.0a1 - 2011-06-20 - Windows 7 x64
  • NO REPRO - 5.0 - Windows 7
  • NO REPRO - 4.0.1 - Windows 7 x64, Linux (Iceweasel)
  • NO REPRO - 3.6.18 - Windows 7

Chrome - BAD

  • REPRO - 14.0.797.0 dev - Windows 7 x64
  • REPRO - 13 - Windows 7, Linux
  • REPRO - 12.0.742.5 dev - Windows 7 x64
  • REPRO - 10 - Windows 7 x64
  • REPRO - 12.0.742.100 - Ubuntu 10.10 x86

IE - BAD

Safari - BAD

  • REPRO - 5.0.5 (7533.21.1) - Windows 7 x64
  • REPRO - 5.0.5 (6533.21.1) - Mac OS X 10.6
  • REPRO - Mobile Safari iPhone iOS 5.0 beta 2
share|improve this answer
3  
@Tom Thanks for the cleanup and better format! – Adam Davis Jun 27 '11 at 18:00

This can be fixed in most browsers by applying a wrapping class to links that exceed the post width:

.force-wrap
{
    white-space:
        pre-wrap,
        -moz-pre-wrap !important,
        -pre-wrap, -o-pre-wrap;

    word-wrap:
        break-word;
 }

Specific browser fixes:

  1. Chrome: CSS 3: pre-wrap: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/text.html#white-space-prop

  2. FF < 3.5: -moz-pre-wrap !important: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/CSS/white-space

  3. Opera: -pre-wrap, -o-pre-wrap;: No specific official reference, often mentioned.

  4. IE 9: break-word: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/ms531184.aspx

What I see:

  1. Firefox: Still not occurring.

  2. Google Chrome: No longer occurring.

  3. Opera: No longer occurring.

  4. Internet Explorer 9: Still occurring, has been reduced as one split does takes place...

share|improve this answer

This could also be fixed by not pasting in whopping great big raw URL's such as that one.

Sometimes a raw url is fine, but it's better to hide under a "fancier link" (as the help calls it) with a sensible textual description about what is being linked to:

- [link to something of interest](http://myreally.big.url/....)
share|improve this answer
    
Perhaps we could reject posts that have links of X subsequent characters with a warning? – Tom Wijsman Jun 27 '11 at 20:14
    
@AdamDavis: To what would it convert the link? – Tom Wijsman Jun 27 '11 at 21:25
    
@Tom Sorry, I read "reject posts" and thought of autoconverting them instead, using the format of this answer. I'm somewhere around 13-14 steps away from what I'm reading apparently. Anyway, ignore the ravings of this madman. – Adam Davis Jun 27 '11 at 21:27

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .