What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 131 Stack Exchange communities.

After a new user gets two questions closed, or two answers deleted as non-answers (or any combination thereof), send the following message to them using the moderator messaging system (it doesn't have to be copied to the other moderators):

Welcome to Stack Overflow!

We have noticed that a couple of your posts were closed or deleted. If you are familiar with traditional forums on the Internet, you should know that we work quite differently from those (we are a question and answer site, not a discussion forum).

We strongly suggest that you familiarize yourself with the FAQ and learn how things work here, as there are automated mechanisms in place that permanently ban first-time users who do not engage effectively with the community. We don't want that to happen to you, so please take a few moments to learn how the site works and how you can participate productively.

Thanks, and happy hunting from your friends at Stack Overflow!

Note: The primary purpose of this is to provide the warning about the permanent, automated bans, and to point them one last time to the resources that will help them prevent that from occurring. It's not intended to save everyone (it won't).

This differs from the usual signposts, because it is a message directed at the user himself (whereas the signposts can always be dismissed as information for someone else).

share|improve this question

closed as too localized by Robert Harvey Jun 27 '11 at 22:37

This question is unlikely to help any future visitors; it is only relevant to a small geographic area, a specific moment in time, or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not generally applicable to the worldwide audience of the internet. For help making this question more broadly applicable, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

    
Would rather it not be copied –  random Jun 27 '11 at 18:28
8  
I think there needs to be an implied threat of violence in there somewhere. –  Won't Jun 27 '11 at 18:53
    
@Won't: Something about "Hunt you down with a rake", perhaps? –  Cyclone Jun 27 '11 at 19:52
1  
"An implied threat of violence"... how about using "Love, \n Will" as the valediction? (@Wont) –  Pops Jun 27 '11 at 20:45
    
Unfortunately, moderator messages exhibit forum-like behavior... –  Shog9 Jun 27 '11 at 21:10
4  
Nice idea, but experience has taught me that the majority of people that would receive this simply don't read. It would give people one last warning before the system stops accepting posts, but I don't know how much it would pay off. –  Tim Post Jun 27 '11 at 21:11

3 Answers 3

I'm with Tim here:

Nice idea, but experience has taught me that the majority of people that would receive this simply don't read. It would give people one last warning before the system stops accepting posts, but I don't know how much it would pay off.

And Tom:

Telling users they are on the edge of a ban is discouraging, they can even prevent asking more questions because they want to be safe. In's like saying "Don't make me punish you!"

There are a lot of signals when things are going wrong for new users:

  • your posts are downvoted
  • your posts are removed (which shows a link to the faq#deletion, when viewed)
  • users (or mods) comment on your posts telling you about various problems with your posts

It's not like they aren't being presented with advice and guidance, already. There is:

  • the auto-help that pops up for new users when they focus the answer input area
  • the mandatory how to ask clickthrough page for all new users when asking questions,
  • dynamic mandatory how to answer help for short answers

... etcetera.

I don't really see the point of presenting these oblivious users with Yet More Help Text They Will Not Read.

If they can't follow these clear signals, to be quite frank, they don't need education, they need to go away.

share|improve this answer
    
It only has to work 5% of the time to be successful. –  Robert Harvey Jun 27 '11 at 22:34
2  
@robert this is like arguing that the "best" 5% of the trash should not be thrown out. I'd rather focus on encouraging the actual good things in our system rather than playing the losing "what's the best of the worst" game. –  Jeff Atwood Jun 27 '11 at 22:41
    
Fair enough.... –  Robert Harvey Jun 27 '11 at 22:41
    
@robert I think we've implemented all the self-help features we can at this point, and I am open to improving the existing self-help features.. but I am opposed to adding even more, as there is a point of diminishing returns. –  Jeff Atwood Jun 27 '11 at 22:44
    
See my last comment(s) on @Tomwij's answer below. I promise I won't say any more about it. –  Robert Harvey Jun 27 '11 at 23:08

Yesterday I happened across a few posts that were getting flagged into oblivion, where members of the community had been trying to coach the author into using the system properly.

The generic response from said authors went something like this (meta comment):

K, thx but .. plz .. can U help me nEway now? can u reply me .... ...

Basically, translated, "Look, I'm too busy to care about that kind of stuff right now. Just give me what I want and maybe I'll remember next time."

I'm not saying all cases would be like that, and in fact I'm sure that some people would read the message and follow the given advice. However, I think many people would just skim over it, or just dismiss the header notification in their frantic search to get an answer.

I'm not saying it's a bad idea, but I'm a bit skeptical that it would do much good. In my experience, the majority of people who would receive that message:

  • Don't read
  • Don't care
  • Don't read and don't care

Then again, I have no better suggestion on how to slow these people down and 'strongly encourage' them to drop a heightened sense of urgency so they can actually use the system to their advantage.

share|improve this answer
1  
Yep...I'm not trying to save those people, just the 5% to 10% that have functioning gray matter but, for whatever reason, didn't read all the signs. –  Robert Harvey Jun 27 '11 at 21:32

TL;DR: The long message doesn't point at what is different. Skip to the last section, my answer...


Example:

I'm a new user wandering around! Oh, an long alert, what does it say...

Welcome to Stack Overflow!

This isn't my first visit...

We have noticed that a couple of your posts were closed or deleted. If you are familiar with traditional forums on the Internet, you should know that we work quite differently from those (we are a question and answer site, not a discussion forum).

Yeah, I saw that. What is so different?

We strongly suggest that you familiarize yourself with the FAQ and learn how things work here, as there are automated mechanisms in place that permanently ban first-time users who do not engage effectively with the community. We don't want that to happen to you, so please take a few moments to learn how the site works and how you can participate productively.

Does this tell me what's different? Where should I look exactly? TL;DR, why would I read all FAQs?

What did I exactly do wrong that's so forum like? How do I prevent doing that? What's an alternative?

Thanks, and happy hunting from your friends at Stack Overflow!

Erm... What should I be hunting?


Answer:

Even when they do read it, it can be really confusing.

Please come up with a shorter and more precise solution, an example:

We have noticed that a couple of your questions were closed.

Please note that we are a Q&A site and not a traditional forum; we generally focus on practical, answerable questions based on actual problems that you face. Chatty, open-ended discussions are not welcome because they do not lead to useful answers. Consult the FAQ for more details...

Thank you, and have a nice day on #SITENAME#!

Furthermore, I wonder if such a message is really necessary...

Shouldn't we get the close reason to link to the FAQ instead?

share|improve this answer
1  
I'm not picky about the wording. It can say anything you like so long as it includes the warning about permanent banning, which your verbiage seems to have omitted. –  Robert Harvey Jun 27 '11 at 21:59
    
@RobertHarvey: I left that out on purpose. That permanent ban only triggers for people that are unwilling to read the close reasons, this warning and the FAQ and continue to post extremely bad questions. It's more likely to lead them away than be of any use, for that very small percentage. If you disagree, something short like this should do: PS: We automatically ban users that continue to use the site like a forum. We don't want that to happen to you... –  Tom Wijsman Jun 27 '11 at 22:11
    
I don't really understand why you would be reluctant to warn people about the ban. It's like putting grass over a bear trap. What if your trap catches something besides a bear? Well, I suggest there is a more intellectually honest approach. For the record, I didn't read any of this FAQ stuff when I started (I didn't feel the need to). Then again, they didn't have permanent IP bans then. –  Robert Harvey Jun 27 '11 at 22:18
    
@Robert: Telling users they are on the edge of a ban is discouraging, they can even prevent asking more questions because they want to be safe. It's like "Don't make me punish you!", that keeps people away... We aren't going to agree over this, ultimately voting should decide it... –  Tom Wijsman Jun 27 '11 at 22:23
    
That's why you don't want to tell them about it? If they get banned, they're screwed anyway. –  Robert Harvey Jun 27 '11 at 22:24
    
@Robert: That's why you do want to tell them about it? If they flee, we're screwed anyway. –  Tom Wijsman Jun 27 '11 at 22:26
    
So you want to beat around the bush, treating these folks with kid gloves, all the way up to the moment you slam them with a permanent IP ban? –  Robert Harvey Jun 27 '11 at 22:28
1  
@robert no, for the guy who just ran three STOP signs, we don't think adding a fourth "PLEASE STOP" sign is worthwhile. –  Jeff Atwood Jun 27 '11 at 22:33
    
@RobertHarvey: We aren't allowing people of younger age, people are old enough to understand that they should listen to a warning the site gives. We don't have to use our kid gloves to say what would trivially happen if they wouldn't listen and continue to post extremely bad questions. The first close informs the user, the second close informs the user, comments inform the user, that warning informs the user; really, if he is still unwilling to listen then he simply doesn't care... –  Tom Wijsman Jun 27 '11 at 22:36
1  
@Tom: If you want to keep someone from entering an intersection, you put up a stop sign. If you want to keep them from going off a cliff, you put up a fence. Failing to put up a fence suggests that you want them to go over the cliff. That's all. We've developed such a contempt for these people that we now call them trash. Maybe that's true, maybe it isn't. But allowing them to go over the cliff without telling them they are going to go over the cliff (and without any possibility of appeal) is somehow...un-American. –  Robert Harvey Jun 27 '11 at 23:08
    
@Robert: The stop sign doesn't say that a car will crash into them or the police will give you a fine. If you drive through the fence, you fall. The fence warns them that that they shouldn't trespass the fence, but it doesn't tell us there is a large canyon behind it. Warnings only take place in life threatening settings where no earlier indications have been given; that's why we warn for land mines and guarding dogs but not for stop signs and a trivial cliff... –  Tom Wijsman Jun 27 '11 at 23:17
    
It may not be a perfect metaphor, but I trust I've made my point. –  Robert Harvey Jun 27 '11 at 23:20
    
And now we're going in circles... :) –  Tom Wijsman Jun 27 '11 at 23:22
3  
@robert their contributions to our network may be substandard, but I'm sure they're very nice people. Not everyone is qualified to be a brain surgeon, or attend college, or drive a car. –  Jeff Atwood Jun 27 '11 at 23:26
2  
@Jeff: That does improve my understanding, thanks. –  Robert Harvey Jun 27 '11 at 23:30

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .