Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 153 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I attempt to write my edit summaries with the utmost care, but on occasion, I'll be moving to fix something else, and I'll end up with a messed up summary. I have found that if I re-edit within a certain time frame, I can change the summary.

However, I'm wondering if there is a way that I'm not aware of to edit the editing summary without having to make any additional changes.

If there is, or if this feature could be added, the readers of millions of future "fixed spe" messages would thank you.

I did search a bit on this, but searching "editing of edits of edit summaries" confounded the works.

share|improve this question
There is, but you need to put a summary for the edited summary edit, and that summary itself can't be edited. – JNK Jun 29 '11 at 20:09
There was a Meta post long ago about how this behavior opened up an avenue for abuse. – Pops Jun 29 '11 at 20:11
@JNK Yes, you must have been inspired by the last bit that I added to the question even before I was. – jonsca Jun 29 '11 at 20:12
@jonsca - just picked up on the inherent humor in trying to edit an edit – JNK Jun 29 '11 at 20:13
@Popular Yes, I could understand that. The entire editing system requires quite a bit of trust as it is, though. I promise I won't change all of my summaries to read "Pi11s 4 fr33" :) – jonsca Jun 29 '11 at 20:14
Not sure if this was it, but if it's not, it's similar:… – Pops Jun 29 '11 at 20:18
@Popular I wasn't aware of that, but I'm just suggesting a Edit Summary next to the Link|Source|Edit. I guess you could hide that button from anyone but the current editor. – jonsca Jun 29 '11 at 20:21
Oh, I know, I wasn't trying to say that your request was good/bad/duplicative. It just reminded me, that's all. – Pops Jun 29 '11 at 20:29
possible duplicate… – qdinar Dec 15 '15 at 9:20
up vote 6 down vote accepted

You can make it without any additional final changes, but in reality what you can do is make two changes in the 5 minute grace period. This is a workaround and a somewhat taxing one at that, but it's functional and I do it all the time.

First, edit your question with some very small edit. It doesn't matter what it is. You should elect to add your new edit summary at this point - thanks to this new feature, it will stick around. It'll also make the job easier since you can just edit it in place rather than re-type the whole thing.

After submitting that edit, start editing again and simply remove the change you made in the previous edit. The end point will be all the content of your previous edit, but you'll have the revised summary you wanted. If you didn't elect to add the summary in the previous step, by the way, you'll obviously need to add it in this revision. Otherwise it'll be all for naught!

share|improve this answer
I had thought about this approach, but it feels like a workaround. C'est la vie, I suppose. :) Thanks, Grace. – jonsca Jun 30 '11 at 2:53
Hmm, took me more than 5 minutes to learn about this workaround... I'll use it next time though. – oberlies Jun 12 '14 at 15:41

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .