Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Notwithstanding the fact that people often confuse mouse (the physical object) and cursor (the thing on the screen), the tag has a description related to Perl:

Mouse is an object system for Perl that provides a subset of Moose's functionality. It aims to be highly compatible with Moose, has faster start up times and no dependencies.

but is used in 99.8% of cases as meaning the physical object (or its onscreen representation).

There are 2 items for the "real" meaning (Perl) of Mouse that I can find . The other 862 items in are, by that definition, mistagged.

So, do we want to resolve this, and if so, how?

share|improve this question
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Feel free to edit the tag wiki excerpt with what you feel is right, then assuming you have less than 20K reputation, it will require two 10K members to approve this and you're all done. :)

The current tag wiki excerpt was created by Perl developer so this explains why it looks like this.

share|improve this answer
I kinda feel bad about officializing the co-opting of this tag, but I guess I can rely on the wisdom of 10Kers. The 2 Perl related cases, though, I wonder if a "mouse-perl" be appropriate. – MPelletier Jun 30 '11 at 14:19
Don't feel bad, that's what all this "peer review" is all about. Regarding mouse-perl I dunno, maybe just perl? – Shadow Wizard Jun 30 '11 at 14:26
perl-mouse looks better. – Brian Jun 30 '11 at 16:25
@BrAvada It does. Great idea, tag created. – MPelletier Jun 30 '11 at 20:17

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .