Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Could you set the default syntax highlighting for questions to C++? (unless they contain the or its synonyms)?

Reading through large chucks of poorly formatted code is marginally easier when the syntax highlighting is enabled. But Most questions don't have highlighting enabled.

There are 1004 questions tagged with . That said:

Only 11 questions are flagged with +

134 questions are flagged with +

193 questions are flagged with +.

share|improve this question
It would be interesting to see what happens when two tags are associated to two different highlighting modes, and see which one has the priority. – kiamlaluno Jul 3 '11 at 2:34
@kiamlaluno: neither. If two tags on a question both have a highlighting syntax defined, the highlighter defaults to autodetect. – Shog9 Jul 3 '11 at 3:21
I would think that the CUDA questions I linked to would be auto-detected, but there is no syntax-highlighting. (e.g. here here <-- and both appear to be pretty standard C++ ) – M. Tibbits Jul 3 '11 at 3:24
Thank you to whom ever just turned that on!! :O) – M. Tibbits Jul 3 '11 at 3:25
up vote 4 down vote accepted

I set the language to "default" (auto-detect - should result in reasonable highlighting for C-like code) for . That shouldn't interfere with anything important (you'll get highlighting now for things like stack traces if you use a code block for them, but that's pretty common anyway - prefix them with <!-- language: lang-none --> if you care).

FWIW, there's no highlighting available for FORTRAN. So the results of cuda+fortran code blocks are a little... interesting. Again, it can be turned off on a per-block basis if necessary.

share|improve this answer
Again, thanks! This looks much better! – M. Tibbits Jul 3 '11 at 3:43

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .