What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 134 Stack Exchange communities.

This question already has an answer here:

Having the questions you've already voted on makes it more work to find things that still need attention.

Note, I am talking about when you refresh the page, not the JavaScript action that happens immediately after you action an item.

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by animuson Aug 13 '13 at 17:58

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

    
Related: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/122368/… –  Rob Hruska Apr 2 '12 at 12:33
    
Related: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/96426/… –  Rob Hruska Apr 2 '12 at 12:33
5  
I solved the problem by not bothering with doing edits anymore. –  Lawrence Dol Apr 2 '12 at 21:13

1 Answer 1

I'm just reviewing now and wanted to asked exactly for the same feature. It would really make reviewing much more fluent! Just hide those edits immediately after you vote to Approve or Reject!

Maybe there could be a possibility to show these edits (e.g. by some switch/filter), but it is not necessary.

share|improve this answer
4  
I'd actually like it to go further, and let me "skip" edits. With the random sorting, I see the same edits over and over and over and over and over and over. I realize that'd be a fair amount of work for the devs (persisting those skipped edits). They wouldn't have to store it on the DB though - I'd be happy with a LocalStorage solution, even. –  Rob Hruska Apr 2 '12 at 12:36
    
@RobHruska, but the information on what you voted on already is in the DB! So in fact no new storage is needed here! It writes "You already voted to accept this edit...", so in fact the change could be quite easy - just don't display it then! –  Tomas Apr 3 '12 at 0:15
    
Well, I'm talking about the ones that I don't act on (i.e. skipped). I'd rather have a "Skip" button than have to scroll through ones I've seen half a dozen times. –  Rob Hruska Apr 3 '12 at 0:33
    
But @Rob, that's a completely different discussion. –  Tomas Apr 3 '12 at 0:40
    
No disagreement there - I just like to take the opportunity to go on a rant about it whenever I can :) –  Rob Hruska Apr 3 '12 at 1:21
    
+1: I just came over here to ask this same question –  Chris Laplante Apr 3 '12 at 2:33

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .