What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 128 Stack Exchange communities.

I posted an answer (pointing to another question already asked) but when I hit submit, I saw my answer appear as a comment to the question instead.

I tried it a couple of times and still the same result. The answer gets eaten up and is transformed into a comment.

Is this a bug?

share|improve this question
34  
It's a bug in the Stack Overflow developers. –  Lightness Races in Orbit Aug 9 '11 at 11:47
23  
It's a bug in the answerer. –  paulmorriss Aug 10 '11 at 16:09
12  
@paulmorriss: It absolutely is not. –  Lightness Races in Orbit Aug 14 '11 at 0:48
2  
This is very annoying when the answer to a site Meta post is a Meta SO post where the answer really is posted :/ –  Ben Brocka Apr 13 '12 at 20:59
    
Oh, it's a bug in design, or by-design. Please add bug-bydesign tag. –  Donaudampfschifffreizeitfahrt Dec 20 '13 at 13:22

3 Answers 3

up vote 62 down vote accepted

Trivial answers containing a link to another question in the network are automatically converted to comments on the question, with the message

Trivial answer converted to comment

Poking some folks about perhaps a wee bit more indication that that happens, looked like a bug to me at first too.


auto-comment conversion feedback
About what it'd look like, mildly faked image though

After some internal discussion, when we convert an answer auto-magically we'll do the "linked answer" fade + a one time message to the poster only. This will not survive navigating away from the page, by design.

share|improve this answer
22  
I would say that if it confuses those who know about it, it's probably not good UI design :) –  Daniel DiPaolo Jul 18 '11 at 23:08
13  
@dan well, we really want these users who post "answers" that are short links to other SE, Inc questions to ... stop ... so it's either do this, or have your "answer" downvoted and/or deleted. –  Jeff Atwood Jul 18 '11 at 23:10
3  
@Daniel - I didn't actually know about it. I agree its confusing, tweaking that a bit if I can. –  Kevin Montrose Jul 18 '11 at 23:11
1  
I've updated the list of current automatic content modifications to include this. –  user7116 Jul 18 '11 at 23:15
1  
@Kevin - perhaps unrelated, but there was a similar change requested: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/83912/… –  martin clayton Jul 18 '11 at 23:24
19  
@Jeff apologies, what would be helpful is to display a message at the top explaining what's happened, and a link to a faq page explaining similar behaviour and desired usage. I know I for one would be too lazy to read it until I do something that I get notified is undesired. –  Michael Jul 18 '11 at 23:43
1  
@Jeff, Is this something which could be relaxed on Meta? I understand the utility on Stack Overflow, etc, but here -- when users ask if something is off-topic, for example -- I have thought a one sentence explanation and a link to a similar question would suffice?? –  M. Tibbits Jul 20 '11 at 4:08
11  
This is poor. With 91k rep on SO I'm sure I've got the hang of answering questions... –  gbn Jul 21 '11 at 10:50
3  
@Jeff can you explain why you dont want short answers (I take it this is what is meant by trivial) that link to an answer to another question. This is why I want the faq because I'm relatively new and don't understand this. I've tried searching meta and found one understandable reason mentioned here meta.stackexchange.com/questions/17447 for answers like "why don't you post it over here" but is that really common? The most common reason I would have thought is linking to an answer that answers the question which this meta question says is ok meta.stackexchange.com/questions/21270 –  Michael Jul 22 '11 at 23:54
1  
@Jeff if this behaviour was mainly intended for "why don't you post it over here" or "I think your question is similar to" then why not exclude links to answers from this behaviour so that only answers with links to questions or faq pages etc are automatically converted to a comment. –  Michael Jul 22 '11 at 23:58
6  
Can we do this for all answers where the link is more than 10% of the total answer length, for any link (not just internal links)? A link is not an answer - it's a pointer to an answer, perhaps, but not an answer. –  Adam Davis Aug 1 '11 at 23:21
4  
@JeffAtwood, can you post that as an answer so I can downvote you? Sometimes the answer is just short. –  Ben Jan 25 '12 at 15:51
2  
I find it amusing that even if I am unable to comment on a question I can answer trivially, and thus still comment. An oversight if you ask me. –  scape Oct 16 '12 at 14:42
1  
In my opinion this is an awesome feature on paper, but I find it to be absolutely annoying. There is a point where people are just going to get frustrated by the level of hand holding that's going on. Please don't put us in the position where we are actually considering using the asp.net forums instead... –  The Muffin Man Mar 27 '13 at 18:20
3  
@JeffAtwood What happened to letting the community decide whether an answer was good enough to be one or not? Now you're allowing Skynet to make that decision and it fails just like it did in Terminator. –  The Muffin Man Mar 27 '13 at 18:25

This "feature" is horrendous. Some questions may be answered perfectly well in a couple of sentences.

"var is deprecated, and you forgot the $ in $idgen" is perfectly acceptable as an answer, especially when I explicitly didn't want to just throw the full completed code snippet at the OP.

It doesn't help that the conversion kept the answer-style decoupled link syntax, which comment Markdown doesn't support; thus my post was (a) completely mangled, (b) not posted where I wanted it to be posted, and (c) not posted where it belonged.


Update

This is incredibly irritating. I am now physically incapable of posting my answer to this question as ... an answer.

enter image description here

At 28.5k rep, I know what an answer looks like and what a comment looks like.

STOP second guessing me. Stop implementing all these nonsense features that nobody asked for.

(Perhaps get to work auto-removing trailing "thanks" instead!)

share|improve this answer
5  
The problem was that you were linking to another Stack Overflow question. If you'd linked to the original source then it might have OK. –  ChrisF Jul 20 '11 at 13:16
4  
I'm with you. It needs weighted for, say, user rep –  gbn Jul 21 '11 at 10:49
8  
Just to add - if you're linking to another Stack Overflow question, maybe you should be voting to close as a duplicate. –  ChrisF Aug 9 '11 at 11:52
27  
@ChrisF: No. You should vote to close as a duplicate when the question is a duplicate; no other time. That's why it's called "closing as a duplicate". –  Lightness Races in Orbit Aug 9 '11 at 11:57
2  
I did say maybe - I agree it's not always the case, but it's usually a good indication. –  ChrisF Aug 9 '11 at 12:01
9  
@ChrisF: In fact, 100% of the time when I'm linking to another SO question, it's not a duplicate. Because if it's a duplicate, I vote to close as such. :) –  Lightness Races in Orbit Aug 9 '11 at 12:06
11  
bah, this kinda sucks ... my "answer" is in fact to point them to the other SO answer which answered it much better. Now it can't be chosen as the answer to the question - this will only suggest people that they should copy/paste the other answer. –  Joel Martinez Aug 13 '11 at 21:43
8  
In this case, the other answer didn't answer the question at hand. "You need a linker" was the answer. The link was for additional information -- essentially, answering the OP's next question. –  Lightness Races in Orbit Aug 24 '11 at 11:42
10  
I'm with you. This is incredibly annoying and disgustingly paternalistic. I'm going to avoid contributing to stackoverflow in the future since it evidently already knows the answers better than I do. –  c-urchin Nov 10 '11 at 15:40
1  
StackOverflow got mad at you for the stuff between the <!-- and -->. –  muntoo Nov 24 '11 at 5:56
2  
@muntoo: No, I added that on my third attempt. –  Lightness Races in Orbit Nov 24 '11 at 14:08
4  
Can't agree more, I'm tired of SO second-guessing me and insulting my intelligence... –  HighCommander4 Apr 10 '12 at 21:32
3  
@LightnessRacesinOrbit +1 for being one of the only seemingly moral and upright people in this community. THank you for not victim blaming, and actually having eyes to see the truth of how disgusting some people were. Thank you VERY much. I wish everyone was like you. –  Carter81 Oct 22 '13 at 14:22
1  
@Catfish: To be fair, "I found how to get all of the results from this answer stackoverflow.com/questions/14829130/…" is not an answer. –  Lightness Races in Orbit Apr 16 at 13:54
1  
@Catfish: Links are not answers, and that's been done to death on Meta already. If your question turned out to be the same as some other question, vote to close it as a duplicate. If an answer to a marginally-related question helped, link to it but also quote enough information so that it makes sense on your question. Show the final code. Don't just write "I got my answer here" as that is not an answer but a blog entry. :) –  Lightness Races in Orbit Apr 16 at 15:45

This is terrible. If it's another question on the same site, then I get it- it's a duplicate, effectively. But if the question is on a different site, then it's not a duplicate and the questioner could not have found it by searching the site he was on.

Come on guys, this is definitively unnecessary.

share|improve this answer
2  
It's still a trivial answer, regardless of whether it's a viable duplicate. If you're going to answer a question, answer it with a real answer - not just a link. –  jadarnel27 Jul 2 '12 at 14:31
1  
@jadarnel27: It was a real answer. That answer happened to be both short and contain a link to another question. But it was still an answer. –  DeadMG Jul 2 '12 at 14:46
    
Here's the answer that's typically link to concerning link-only answers. The most important bit (I think) is this: "...the question "answer" should actually contain an answer. Not just a bunch of directions towards the answer." –  jadarnel27 Jul 2 '12 at 14:53
2  
@jadarnel27: It was a perfectly good answer. The link just happened to add more content. –  DeadMG Jul 3 '12 at 10:21
    
Sorry, I wasn't trying to say your specific answer wasn't helpful, or even correct. It's just not a good answer answer for Stack Exchange - because it makes people chase the answer (through the link) and it's quite possible that it won't be useful to future visitors (due to link rot). –  jadarnel27 Jul 3 '12 at 12:15

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .