Linked Questions

14
votes
1answer
77 views

Confused by audit failure [duplicate]

http://stackoverflow.com/review/close/4192913 This question was presented as possibly off-topic and when I agreed I got the "You failed" message. The question is about navigating a Haskell site and ...
4
votes
1answer
82 views

Gotcha's in Close Vote queue are sometimes too subjective [duplicate]

Let me start out by saying that I do my best to give every question due diligence in the Close Votes queue. However, every now and then, Stack Overflow likes to throw in a gotcha question to make sure ...
8
votes
1answer
101 views

Dispute reopen review audit [duplicate]

I failed this audit. The original post is here. I don't think this audit is good, because the question is clearly "too broad" and should be closed as such, and remain closed as such. No harm is ...
14
votes
0answers
120 views

Another bad (really bad!) close review audit [duplicate]

When this question came up in the review queue I was certain it was an audit verifying I would close it as Off topic: asking to recommend a favorite tool, library, offsite resource, whatever.. Turns ...
11
votes
0answers
92 views

Bad audit for Close votes review [duplicate]

I just stumbled upon this audit - it is not programming related, it is not about browsers and the tags are all wrong - it is not a question for SO. I obviously hit Close and it shows as failed audit. ...
5
votes
0answers
45 views

Inappropriate review audit answer for “FTPS versus SFTP versus SCP” [duplicate]

A while ago I failed a review audit because of the known problem that adding a comment to a highly upvoted post is being considered bad and that the answer is not completely correct. The failed ...
1
vote
0answers
55 views

should not review audits be less confusing and tricky? [duplicate]

I failed another closing review audit (Link) today, anyway i find this one really a bad audit, its an accepted question with two answers, the issue is clear there, should not audits refer to clearly ...
144
votes
3answers
1k views

Review audits and “I understand” button

Background This is somewhat specific to StackOverflow. My concern is the "I understand" button that appears when you fail a Review Audit. I had this experience twice recently (after never having ...
79
votes
5answers
2k views

Why no honeypot suggested edits?

While the review audits are great and much needed, as far as I can tell they do not apply for the suggested edits queue. Robo reviewers can still approve crap and smile all the way to their badges. ...
21
votes
6answers
553 views

What an audit!? Would you fail?

Came across this answer in the review queue (the answer has since been edited by Gilles, here's the version I reviewed). Scanning through comments quickly I see that people are saying: I do not ...
22
votes
3answers
338 views

Are the suggested edit audits too easy?

Yes, this might be another post complaining about audits. But, in this case, I want the audits to be more difficult. Specifically, I'm concerned that the suggested edits audits are just too darn easy ...
19
votes
3answers
403 views

Failed low-quality review audit

I recently came across this answer (to a question on implementing echo cancellation in Java) in the low quality review queue: The only way to supress echo is to use "C" libary of AEC and call it ...
21
votes
3answers
202 views

Review audit seems wrong

I recently got this question on a review audit. Although I agree with what is being said in the Answer, I don't think it is an Answer. Shouldn't it be a comment instead? I obviously failed, as I ...
19
votes
2answers
276 views

YARAFP: Yet Another Review Audit Failed Post

I just failed a close-vote audit by voting to close this question. I genuinely believe there is a good case for closing it, as the question has a number of issues. Yes, it has five upvotes, an ...
16
votes
3answers
288 views

Stupid audits (again)

This audit is just flat out stupid. It is a valid answer with a code example and good reasoning, although it may not be the right one from a technical perspective, but: THAT IS NOT THE POINT OF ...

15 30 50 per page