118

The comment reads:

possible duplicate of [link]

The missing capitalization bothers me a lot; it should be Possible.

8
  • 20
    possible duplicate of meta.stackexchange.com/questions/44528/…
    – random
    Commented Mar 30, 2010 at 10:38
  • 1
    actually i'd rather not see them capitalized. for as much text as they have it's not necessary, and comments already feel informal. Commented Mar 30, 2010 at 11:11
  • 9
    I hate it when someone posts using my name... I hate this feabug!
    – juan
    Commented Mar 30, 2010 at 14:09
  • 17
    @Downvoter, couldn't agree more. Also, if it's going to look like it came from me, it damn well better be written correctly. Commented Mar 31, 2010 at 2:03
  • 11
    I've just reached the threshold to mark questions as duplicates, but I don't think I really want to do it now that I'm automatically attributed with poor grammar.
    – Town
    Commented May 12, 2011 at 22:42
  • Shouldn't this be status-complete now, since the current format is capitalized? Commented Nov 5, 2012 at 19:02
  • 4
    Don't you just hate it when a presumable 1-line 'safe' change gets greatly upvoted by the community, but declined? It doesn't do much for my faith in the voting system on Meta. @MyNameIsNotMcThomasJohannson Based on a possible duplicate comment an hour ago, it doesn't look changed to me (unless it was changed back). Commented Oct 3, 2013 at 15:45
  • 2
    This has been changed now.
    – Cerbrus
    Commented Sep 30, 2015 at 13:39

7 Answers 7

28

down with capitalism!

To Serve and Correct - Grammar Police

4
  • 20
    I have, quite possibly, more fun on meta than I ought to have.
    – Pollyanna
    Commented Mar 30, 2010 at 10:38
  • 4
    possible duplicate of meta.stackoverflow.com/a/44530/155641
    – Alain
    Commented May 1, 2012 at 20:18
  • This is "funny" and all, but it's not an answer. Yes, I know this is very old, but it still reflects poorly on the quality of MSE. Not to mention the blatant offensiveness about calling people with a certain political ideology "pigs". Commented Feb 14, 2021 at 7:01
  • @TheforestofReinstateMonica If it ain't woke, fix it 'till it is. I realize this 11 year old joke could be considered offensive, though paired with the opposing post I made (which has fewer votes) it should be clear that it's a pair of answers with no content to allow meta users to vote on one option or the other, since that's what this question is about. Nevertheless, I'll remove the word "pigs" since it's a very loaded term, and by so doing it attacks the idea, not people who believe it. I hope this is woke enough for Meta to leave it, however I welcome delete votes by anyone who hates fun.
    – Pollyanna
    Commented Feb 15, 2021 at 15:23
32

Obviously this is , so everyone should just accept the judgment passed down from on high, but to further elaborate a bit of why people might be bothered...

Bad punctuation/grammar/spelling is one thing when someone else does it, it's entirely another when it's attributed to you.

if jeff wants to rite liek this on his site thats his perogative.

If words are going to be automatically attributed to me, I don't want them to reflect badly on me.

If capitalizing a single letter is too hard, having the Community user be the comment owner would make this far less obnoxious.

4
  • 6
    Obviously, the system doesn't care about proper grammar. Oh wait: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/94370/… Commented Feb 24, 2012 at 2:03
  • 1
    that's* by the way. I agree with this answer.
    – crush
    Commented Jan 31, 2014 at 20:10
  • 2
    @crush Exactly! I produce my own errors. I don't need any extras!
    – blahdiblah
    Commented Jan 31, 2014 at 20:59
  • 1
    I agree. I just voted to close a question as a duplicate (first time I've done that), and the lowercase "p" reflects poorly on me. It should be a capital "P". Why is this even an issue? Just fix the stupid thing so it doesn't make people look bad who are trying to help. Commented Sep 10, 2015 at 5:34
21

Seriously, you don't even need to do anything other than add one CSS rule:

span.comment-copy:first-letter {
    text-transform: uppercase;
}

How is that such a big deal, from the Stack Exchange network that features, among others, 'English Language and Usage' and 'Writers' and was (at least partially) meant to 'trick [us] into becoming...better writers if that's what it takes1 (emphasis Jeff's)?

If you're going to attribute words to us, or put our names on auto-generated comments, then follow the technical specifications of the language in which you're writing, I don't care whether, or not, this comment meets the syntactic and grammatical requirements of a sentence, it really is close enough that capitalisation should be the default.

And, frankly, not-capitalising means I have to waste my time editing a wrongly-capitalised auto-generated comment; if I'm doing that I'd rather not have the auto-comment, since it saves me precisely no time and increases general irritation.

...this has, clearly, been bugging me for a while. Please reconsider the ; I really don't see any significant cost attached to making this request, instead, .


  1. Though the prior assertion about having us 'write without writing' is, in this case, rather more literal than I suspect was ever intended.
5
  • 3
    Though I'd also prefer the upper case P, using CSS to achieve that doesn't feel right to me either.
    – Arjan
    Commented Jun 11, 2012 at 17:30
  • 1
    Agreed; but if the problem was the amount of work/team-involvement required to implement an upper-cased first-letter this seemed to be the absolute easiest means I could think of (though, honestly, I have no idea how changing possible to Possible could involve less work than a simple database query or template-edit...). Commented Jun 11, 2012 at 17:39
  • 1
    I'm sure changing it would have been less time spent than answering/declining this (and duplicate) questions. So I assume implementation effort is not the issue here...
    – Arjan
    Commented Jun 11, 2012 at 17:45
  • 3
    I hadn't considered it that way, to be honest; but if not implementation-effort it suggests a far less...rational/considered resistance to the request. Which seems a little, and I hate to use the word since I'm no longer an infant, unfair. (Not to mention slightly silly.) Commented Jun 11, 2012 at 17:47
  • What about the exceptions, like jQuery? Commented May 16, 2017 at 13:37
19

Maybe someone should run a query on the data dump to see whether uppercase or lowercase is more common for the first character of a comment. My suspicion is that lowercase is more common.

Update: As balpha indicated in a comment, upper-case is far more common:

From the SO March data dump (with the crippled comments, but statistically it should be okay): 1,934,139 comments total, 1,425,013 (73.68%) start with an uppercase letter, 247,919 (12.82%) with a lowercase letter, and 261,207 (13.51%) don't start with a letter at all.

11
  • 10
    From the SO March data dump (with the crippled comments, but statistically it should be okay): 1,934,139 comments total, 1,425,013 (73.68%) start with an uppercase letter, 247,919 (12.82%) with a lowercase letter, and 261,207 (13.51%) don't start with a letter at all.
    – balpha StaffMod
    Commented Mar 30, 2010 at 14:13
  • 7
    In That Case, We All Need To Help Offset This Growing Problem By Capitalizing Every Word Of Our Comments.
    – Aarobot
    Commented Mar 30, 2010 at 14:43
  • 8
    UsErs shOULd jUst cOntInUE UsIng thE sAmE cAsE As thEy hAvE ALwAys bEEn sIncE thEy ArE OnLy cOmmEnts
    – random
    Commented Mar 30, 2010 at 15:15
  • 20
    CamelCaseIsTheWayToGoBecauseAllThoseSpaceCharactersTakeAwayValuableSpaceFromThe600CharLimit
    – balpha StaffMod
    Commented Mar 30, 2010 at 15:24
  • 5
    @balpha - you might need to skip past the username if the comment starts with an @...
    – Pollyanna
    Commented Mar 30, 2010 at 19:57
  • 1
    @balpha: And most of the ones which don't start with a letter probably start with "+1" or "-1". Don't know if it's worth it at this point.
    – mmyers
    Commented Mar 31, 2010 at 5:18
  • 3
    @Pollyanna, @mmyers: Even if all 13.51% no-letter-on-start comments could be argued to fall into the lowercase category, that would still leave us with a 74/26 split und thus the point remains: "Uppercase is more common." That's why I don't think it's worth to start special-casing.
    – balpha StaffMod
    Commented Mar 31, 2010 at 5:25
  • 10
    @balpha - I actually agree with the OP - the capitalization should be corrected, regardless of the precedence. I expect that once you get past the usernames and other non alphabetic characters the incidence of uppercase will likely be higher than 74%. Note also that the OP is voted higher than my funny "against" post. I doubt there are many that actually want it to be lowercase. (but then I'm constantly surprised by people here, so....)
    – Pollyanna
    Commented Mar 31, 2010 at 11:07
  • @balpha Those that don't start with a letter at all start with what?! Commented Sep 25 at 22:50
  • @SnackExchange Punctuation, digits, emojis ...
    – balpha StaffMod
    Commented Sep 26 at 12:20
  • @balpha It's interesting to see that those sentences are even more than sentences that start with a lowercase letter! Commented Sep 26 at 13:02
17

This Is A Capital Idea!

1
  • 12
    Anyone opposing should be subject to capital punishment. Defining "capital punishment" in this context is left as an exercise to the reader.
    – mmyers
    Commented Mar 30, 2010 at 14:50
9

I posted this as suggestion / feature request on Meta.SO, yesterday.

This will be fixed as of build 3735 (on MSE/MSO) and build 2858 (on other sites).
(source)

So, as of those revisions, the feature request is !

-53

It's not a complete sentence, so it doesn't need to be capitalized. We don't capitalize the tabs on the user page, or the homepage, for example.. or, heck, even here on the question page itself.

12
  • 25
    wHY WOULD IT BE SUCH A BIG PROBLEM TO CAPITALIZE THE THING? iT'S NOT THAT HARD AND IT WOULD LOOK BETTER.
    – alex
    Commented Apr 20, 2010 at 8:21
  • 26
    That case, add the words "This is a" and hey presto, a real sentence. Commented Apr 20, 2010 at 8:36
  • 2
    @Farseeker don't be ridiculous. That's way too complicated!
    – alex
    Commented Apr 20, 2010 at 11:55
  • 17
    A sentence ("a string of words", so the one word tabs don't apply) must always be capitalized, "complete" or not (why is it not complete?). Commented Dec 1, 2010 at 15:01
  • 5
    Incredible response. Commented Dec 8, 2011 at 13:07
  • 4
    @Justin Satyr Even if this post would have a thousand down votes Jeff would still not care so it doesn't really matter…
    – user146787
    Commented Jan 24, 2012 at 15:41
  • 4
    this answer is not useful (btw.: Headlines aren't whole sentences, but capitalized too). Commented Feb 7, 2012 at 22:33
  • 9
    Arguing that punctuation doesn't matter because it's ungrammatical... I'm not sure that's going to mollify anyone bothered by this.
    – blahdiblah
    Commented Feb 24, 2012 at 1:12
  • 4
    Is the company's name officially "stack exchange inc."? Does the company use lowercase letters for its name in its legal documents? Commented Nov 20, 2014 at 19:59
  • @pacoverflow You'll be pleased to know this has been fixed long ago, also: meta.stackexchange.com/q/243913/13 ;-) Commented Mar 6, 2017 at 6:12
  • @userunknown Headlines are almost always all-capitalized! Commented Sep 25 at 22:53
  • @SnackExchange: Where - in books, in newspapers? My impression is: rarely. They are rarely capitalized - it happens, yes - it might depend on genre, length of the headline, closeness to whole sentences. Most of the time, they are not. Commented Sep 26 at 14:42

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .