Skip to main content
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
Source Link

When one has the retag privilegeretag privilege, but not the edit privilege, then retagging using "edit" rather than "retag" gets one a confusing message:

Oops! Your edit couldn't be submitted because:

  • You have the privilege to retag questions; to suggest an edit please include a change to the title and/or the body as well

I suggest to change this into something like:

To just retag a question without editing title or body, please step back, and don't choose the edit-link but the retag-link beneath.


Background:

I accidentally chose the "edit" link to retag a question, while using "retag" would have been the right way. I explain my behaviour with the different, but similar looking user interfaces for my accounts on different sites. For example:

  • link|edit|close|flag on German L&U, rep: 1840
  • link|edit|retag|close|flag on Code Golf, rep: 797
  • link|edit|retag|flag on Code Review, rep: 330
  • link|edit|close|flag on Stack Overflow, rep: 4767

I used the edit-link before somewhere else, where it was appropriate, and didn't search for another link.

The current error message assumes I intended to change body + tags, or headline + tags, but had forgotten to edit the other. But in reality, I had never planned to edit something else but the tags, and had the privilege to do so. I didn't understand what it tried to tell me, until I ranted about it and it was explained to me by a moderator.

From the user perspective, a silent acceptance of tag-edits would be preferable. But that has been discussed elsewhere, the result being "it's too rare to need to do that, it would be a complex change". So at least the message could be improved.

This post might remind you about an answer I posted yesterday, but I was encouraged to open a new post on meta. So here we go.

When one has the retag privilege, but not the edit privilege, then retagging using "edit" rather than "retag" gets one a confusing message:

Oops! Your edit couldn't be submitted because:

  • You have the privilege to retag questions; to suggest an edit please include a change to the title and/or the body as well

I suggest to change this into something like:

To just retag a question without editing title or body, please step back, and don't choose the edit-link but the retag-link beneath.


Background:

I accidentally chose the "edit" link to retag a question, while using "retag" would have been the right way. I explain my behaviour with the different, but similar looking user interfaces for my accounts on different sites. For example:

  • link|edit|close|flag on German L&U, rep: 1840
  • link|edit|retag|close|flag on Code Golf, rep: 797
  • link|edit|retag|flag on Code Review, rep: 330
  • link|edit|close|flag on Stack Overflow, rep: 4767

I used the edit-link before somewhere else, where it was appropriate, and didn't search for another link.

The current error message assumes I intended to change body + tags, or headline + tags, but had forgotten to edit the other. But in reality, I had never planned to edit something else but the tags, and had the privilege to do so. I didn't understand what it tried to tell me, until I ranted about it and it was explained to me by a moderator.

From the user perspective, a silent acceptance of tag-edits would be preferable. But that has been discussed elsewhere, the result being "it's too rare to need to do that, it would be a complex change". So at least the message could be improved.

This post might remind you about an answer I posted yesterday, but I was encouraged to open a new post on meta. So here we go.

When one has the retag privilege, but not the edit privilege, then retagging using "edit" rather than "retag" gets one a confusing message:

Oops! Your edit couldn't be submitted because:

  • You have the privilege to retag questions; to suggest an edit please include a change to the title and/or the body as well

I suggest to change this into something like:

To just retag a question without editing title or body, please step back, and don't choose the edit-link but the retag-link beneath.


Background:

I accidentally chose the "edit" link to retag a question, while using "retag" would have been the right way. I explain my behaviour with the different, but similar looking user interfaces for my accounts on different sites. For example:

  • link|edit|close|flag on German L&U, rep: 1840
  • link|edit|retag|close|flag on Code Golf, rep: 797
  • link|edit|retag|flag on Code Review, rep: 330
  • link|edit|close|flag on Stack Overflow, rep: 4767

I used the edit-link before somewhere else, where it was appropriate, and didn't search for another link.

The current error message assumes I intended to change body + tags, or headline + tags, but had forgotten to edit the other. But in reality, I had never planned to edit something else but the tags, and had the privilege to do so. I didn't understand what it tried to tell me, until I ranted about it and it was explained to me by a moderator.

From the user perspective, a silent acceptance of tag-edits would be preferable. But that has been discussed elsewhere, the result being "it's too rare to need to do that, it would be a complex change". So at least the message could be improved.

This post might remind you about an answer I posted yesterday, but I was encouraged to open a new post on meta. So here we go.

replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

When one has the retag privilege, but not the edit privilege, then retagging using "edit" rather than "retag" gets one a confusing message:

Oops! Your edit couldn't be submitted because:

  • You have the privilege to retag questions; to suggest an edit please include a change to the title and/or the body as well

I suggest to change this into something like:

To just retag a question without editing title or body, please step back, and don't choose the edit-link but the retag-link beneath.


Background:

I accidentally chose the "edit" link to retag a question, while using "retag" would have been the right way. I explain my behaviour with the different, but similar looking user interfaces for my accounts on different sites. For example:

  • link|edit|close|flag on German L&U, rep: 1840
  • link|edit|retag|close|flag on Code Golf, rep: 797
  • link|edit|retag|flag on Code Review, rep: 330
  • link|edit|close|flag on Stack Overflow, rep: 4767

I used the edit-link before somewhere else, where it was appropriate, and didn't search for another link.

The current error message assumes I intended to change body + tags, or headline + tags, but had forgotten to edit the other. But in reality, I had never planned to edit something else but the tags, and had the privilege to do so. I didn't understand what it tried to tell me, until I ranted about it and it was explained to me by a moderator.

From the user perspective, a silent acceptance of tag-edits would be preferable. But that has been discussed elsewherehas been discussed elsewhere, the result being "it's too rare to need to do that, it would be a complex change". So at least the message could be improved.

This post might remind you about an answer I posted yesterdayposted yesterday, but I was encouraged to open a new post on meta. So here we go.

When one has the retag privilege, but not the edit privilege, then retagging using "edit" rather than "retag" gets one a confusing message:

Oops! Your edit couldn't be submitted because:

  • You have the privilege to retag questions; to suggest an edit please include a change to the title and/or the body as well

I suggest to change this into something like:

To just retag a question without editing title or body, please step back, and don't choose the edit-link but the retag-link beneath.


Background:

I accidentally chose the "edit" link to retag a question, while using "retag" would have been the right way. I explain my behaviour with the different, but similar looking user interfaces for my accounts on different sites. For example:

  • link|edit|close|flag on German L&U, rep: 1840
  • link|edit|retag|close|flag on Code Golf, rep: 797
  • link|edit|retag|flag on Code Review, rep: 330
  • link|edit|close|flag on Stack Overflow, rep: 4767

I used the edit-link before somewhere else, where it was appropriate, and didn't search for another link.

The current error message assumes I intended to change body + tags, or headline + tags, but had forgotten to edit the other. But in reality, I had never planned to edit something else but the tags, and had the privilege to do so. I didn't understand what it tried to tell me, until I ranted about it and it was explained to me by a moderator.

From the user perspective, a silent acceptance of tag-edits would be preferable. But that has been discussed elsewhere, the result being "it's too rare to need to do that, it would be a complex change". So at least the message could be improved.

This post might remind you about an answer I posted yesterday, but I was encouraged to open a new post on meta. So here we go.

When one has the retag privilege, but not the edit privilege, then retagging using "edit" rather than "retag" gets one a confusing message:

Oops! Your edit couldn't be submitted because:

  • You have the privilege to retag questions; to suggest an edit please include a change to the title and/or the body as well

I suggest to change this into something like:

To just retag a question without editing title or body, please step back, and don't choose the edit-link but the retag-link beneath.


Background:

I accidentally chose the "edit" link to retag a question, while using "retag" would have been the right way. I explain my behaviour with the different, but similar looking user interfaces for my accounts on different sites. For example:

  • link|edit|close|flag on German L&U, rep: 1840
  • link|edit|retag|close|flag on Code Golf, rep: 797
  • link|edit|retag|flag on Code Review, rep: 330
  • link|edit|close|flag on Stack Overflow, rep: 4767

I used the edit-link before somewhere else, where it was appropriate, and didn't search for another link.

The current error message assumes I intended to change body + tags, or headline + tags, but had forgotten to edit the other. But in reality, I had never planned to edit something else but the tags, and had the privilege to do so. I didn't understand what it tried to tell me, until I ranted about it and it was explained to me by a moderator.

From the user perspective, a silent acceptance of tag-edits would be preferable. But that has been discussed elsewhere, the result being "it's too rare to need to do that, it would be a complex change". So at least the message could be improved.

This post might remind you about an answer I posted yesterday, but I was encouraged to open a new post on meta. So here we go.

replaced http://meta.unix.stackexchange.com/ with https://unix.meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

When one has the retag privilege, but not the edit privilege, then retagging using "edit" rather than "retag" gets one a confusing message:

Oops! Your edit couldn't be submitted because:

  • You have the privilege to retag questions; to suggest an edit please include a change to the title and/or the body as well

I suggest to change this into something like:

To just retag a question without editing title or body, please step back, and don't choose the edit-link but the retag-link beneath.


Background:

I accidentally chose the "edit" link to retag a question, while using "retag" would have been the right way. I explain my behaviour with the different, but similar looking user interfaces for my accounts on different sites. For example:

  • link|edit|close|flag on German L&U, rep: 1840
  • link|edit|retag|close|flag on Code Golf, rep: 797
  • link|edit|retag|flag on Code Review, rep: 330
  • link|edit|close|flag on Stack Overflow, rep: 4767

I used the edit-link before somewhere else, where it was appropriate, and didn't search for another link.

The current error message assumes I intended to change body + tags, or headline + tags, but had forgotten to edit the other. But in reality, I had never planned to edit something else but the tags, and had the privilege to do so. I didn't understand what it tried to tell me, until I ranted about itranted about it and it was explained to me by a moderator.

From the user perspective, a silent acceptance of tag-edits would be preferable. But that has been discussed elsewhere, the result being "it's too rare to need to do that, it would be a complex change". So at least the message could be improved.

This post might remind you about an answer I posted yesterday, but I was encouraged to open a new post on meta. So here we go.

When one has the retag privilege, but not the edit privilege, then retagging using "edit" rather than "retag" gets one a confusing message:

Oops! Your edit couldn't be submitted because:

  • You have the privilege to retag questions; to suggest an edit please include a change to the title and/or the body as well

I suggest to change this into something like:

To just retag a question without editing title or body, please step back, and don't choose the edit-link but the retag-link beneath.


Background:

I accidentally chose the "edit" link to retag a question, while using "retag" would have been the right way. I explain my behaviour with the different, but similar looking user interfaces for my accounts on different sites. For example:

  • link|edit|close|flag on German L&U, rep: 1840
  • link|edit|retag|close|flag on Code Golf, rep: 797
  • link|edit|retag|flag on Code Review, rep: 330
  • link|edit|close|flag on Stack Overflow, rep: 4767

I used the edit-link before somewhere else, where it was appropriate, and didn't search for another link.

The current error message assumes I intended to change body + tags, or headline + tags, but had forgotten to edit the other. But in reality, I had never planned to edit something else but the tags, and had the privilege to do so. I didn't understand what it tried to tell me, until I ranted about it and it was explained to me by a moderator.

From the user perspective, a silent acceptance of tag-edits would be preferable. But that has been discussed elsewhere, the result being "it's too rare to need to do that, it would be a complex change". So at least the message could be improved.

This post might remind you about an answer I posted yesterday, but I was encouraged to open a new post on meta. So here we go.

When one has the retag privilege, but not the edit privilege, then retagging using "edit" rather than "retag" gets one a confusing message:

Oops! Your edit couldn't be submitted because:

  • You have the privilege to retag questions; to suggest an edit please include a change to the title and/or the body as well

I suggest to change this into something like:

To just retag a question without editing title or body, please step back, and don't choose the edit-link but the retag-link beneath.


Background:

I accidentally chose the "edit" link to retag a question, while using "retag" would have been the right way. I explain my behaviour with the different, but similar looking user interfaces for my accounts on different sites. For example:

  • link|edit|close|flag on German L&U, rep: 1840
  • link|edit|retag|close|flag on Code Golf, rep: 797
  • link|edit|retag|flag on Code Review, rep: 330
  • link|edit|close|flag on Stack Overflow, rep: 4767

I used the edit-link before somewhere else, where it was appropriate, and didn't search for another link.

The current error message assumes I intended to change body + tags, or headline + tags, but had forgotten to edit the other. But in reality, I had never planned to edit something else but the tags, and had the privilege to do so. I didn't understand what it tried to tell me, until I ranted about it and it was explained to me by a moderator.

From the user perspective, a silent acceptance of tag-edits would be preferable. But that has been discussed elsewhere, the result being "it's too rare to need to do that, it would be a complex change". So at least the message could be improved.

This post might remind you about an answer I posted yesterday, but I was encouraged to open a new post on meta. So here we go.

Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
Source Link
Loading
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
Source Link
Loading
Post Closed as "Not suitable for this site" by Shog9
edited tags
Link
Geoff Dalgas
  • 48.9k
  • 10
  • 136
  • 183
Loading
Not SE, but SO. Added note about the privileges.
Source Link
Arjan
  • 28.2k
  • 18
  • 112
  • 176
Loading
Restructured and removed some noise. Hope this is okay. (I think more could be deleted, but I'll leave that decision to the author.)
Source Link
Arjan
  • 28.2k
  • 18
  • 112
  • 176
Loading
Typo: 'to place' => 'took place'
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading