Timeline for Best way to reference the PostgreSQL manual?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2021 at 18:25 | answer | added | Erwin Brandstetter | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 3, 2020 at 13:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Mar 26, 2012 at 16:57 | history | edited | Erwin Brandstetter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Cleanup
|
| Mar 26, 2012 at 16:26 | history | edited | Erwin Brandstetter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
update on /interactive
|
| Dec 7, 2011 at 5:41 | history | edited | Erwin Brandstetter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
add new devel docs
|
| Oct 18, 2011 at 3:17 | vote | accept | Erwin Brandstetter | ||
| Oct 13, 2011 at 16:40 | answer | added | xzilla | timeline score: 7 | |
| Oct 7, 2011 at 20:52 | comment | added | user1228 | I guess not.... | |
| Oct 7, 2011 at 20:27 | comment | added | Erwin Brandstetter | @Won'tಠ_ಠ: I forgot to mention, the /interactive branch of the docs is dropped at end-of-life. Added that piece in the question. Would you still favor /interactive over /static? | |
| Oct 7, 2011 at 20:23 | history | edited | Erwin Brandstetter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
add end-of-life
|
| Oct 7, 2011 at 20:12 | comment | added | user1228 | Seems like you should default to the latest documentation, but if you are referring to a previous version, then link to that version's documentation. Interactive seems a better choice than static, as it will have more information. No, this isn't perfect, but how can you be? | |
| Oct 7, 2011 at 19:38 | history | asked | Erwin Brandstetter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |