Timeline for I propose changing the term "closed" out for... something else
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2012 at 5:47 | comment | added | Andriy M | ‘Neither of these has any functional effect; "closed" and "needs revision" should behave exactly the same.’ – What wording would you suggest in place of re-open for questions that "need revision"? I mean, would it make sense to leave the re-open text without change? Wouldn't that suggest the author of the question that their question was in fact closed, even though it read [needs revision] in the title? | |
| Oct 15, 2011 at 21:58 | comment | added | Caffeinated | This is a great idea really. Good insight | |
| Oct 15, 2011 at 15:11 | comment | added | Shog9 | [Needs Work] is shorter... | |
| Oct 15, 2011 at 3:35 | history | answered | Nicol Bolas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |