Timeline for Is it permissible to counteract a harsh downvote with an upvote on someone else's answer
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 24, 2011 at 21:19 | comment | added | user154510 | @Andrew I do agree with Anthony, and you're right that this is my personal opinion and ... strongly expressed. :P | |
Nov 11, 2011 at 15:14 | comment | added | Andrew | @Anthony - and that may be within a comment, the correct answer. It's an emotive subject clearly - one is always happy to seek guidance, but you have perhaps answered the question. | |
Nov 11, 2011 at 15:11 | comment | added | Anthony Pegram | @Andrew, of course it's permissible. You can vote up or down on any content for any reason, as long as you don't stray into areas of vindictiveness or sock-puppetry. It's your vote, do what you will with it. The community would prefer if you voted based on merit rather than some sense of sympathy, but we certainly cannot require it. | |
Nov 11, 2011 at 15:07 | comment | added | Andrew | This reads as being a very personally emotive answer - your 'hatred' so to speak, but I'm interested more in the voting guidance as to whether its permissible | |
Nov 11, 2011 at 14:49 | history | answered | user154510 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |