Timeline for Regarding Stack Exchange-wide chat moderation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:43 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.gaming.stackexchange.com/ with https://gaming.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Dec 15, 2011 at 15:06 | answer | added | badp | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 30, 2011 at 14:10 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| Nov 30, 2011 at 14:10 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| Nov 22, 2011 at 17:39 | history | edited | Rob Moir |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 22, 2011 at 12:57 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Nov 22, 2011 at 13:12 | |||||
| Nov 22, 2011 at 12:20 | history | notice added | tombull89 | Authoritative reference needed | |
| Nov 22, 2011 at 12:20 | history | bounty started | tombull89 | ||
| Nov 18, 2011 at 8:43 | answer | added | Rob Moir | timeline score: 16 | |
| Nov 18, 2011 at 5:47 | comment | added | Michael Mrozek | We should really just reconsider the whole auto-ban thing in the first place; it seems like it catches a lot of false positives and never catches people actually spamming, which I think is the whole reason it exists | |
| Nov 18, 2011 at 5:31 | comment | added | Michael Petrotta | @six, I'm a fan of oy. | |
| Nov 18, 2011 at 4:40 | comment | added | user7116 | Hell is an offensive word? Well, damn now what am I supposed to use?! | |
| Nov 18, 2011 at 4:22 | history | edited | This_is_NOT_a_forum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Used the official name of the network of sites -see http://stackoverflow.com/legal/trademark-guidance, "Proper Use of the Stack Overflow and Stack Exchange Name".
|
| Nov 17, 2011 at 23:44 | comment | added | Mad Scientist | I'll add that the flagged post in question was "Holy hell" in context of expressing surprise at the existence of a 100h Nyan cat youtube video. I considered that harmless enough that I unsuspended. | |
| Nov 17, 2011 at 23:36 | comment | added | user102937 | Not for nothing, but it is just Chat, and people are expected to be civil in there. Do you really require such language to communicate? Sounds like your particular situation worked out OK, without the need for an additional layer of burdensome rules. | |
| Nov 17, 2011 at 23:31 | history | asked | Thomas Ward | CC BY-SA 3.0 |