Timeline for Could StackExchange embed original questions and answers in their duplicate links?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2012 at 13:34 | vote | accept | Jjed | ||
| Mar 16, 2012 at 13:32 | answer | added | Jjed | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 13, 2012 at 22:22 | vote | accept | Jjed | ||
| Mar 16, 2012 at 13:34 | |||||
| Jan 13, 2012 at 7:18 | answer | added | Jeff Atwood | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 13, 2012 at 5:40 | history | edited | Jjed | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
hopefully more comprehensible "core idea", added "embed question" clarification, hopefully good resposne to Anna's concern
|
| Jan 13, 2012 at 5:34 | history | edited | Jjed | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
hopefully more comprehensible "core idea", added "embed question" clarification
|
| Jan 13, 2012 at 5:30 | comment | added | Jjed | @AnnaLear Hm, I don't really see why. It's not a "whole other question"; it's an exact duplicate. The title and link of the duplicate is preserved for cases where the it is more searchable than the actual question. | |
| Jan 13, 2012 at 5:28 | comment | added | Adam Lear StaffMod | That could potentially be very confusing. A whole other question with (potentially) multiple answers embedded in the body of another question? I think a link is a lot cleaner. Plus, searching should turn up the original question anyway, so searchability shouldn't be an issue. | |
| Jan 13, 2012 at 5:28 | history | edited | Jjed | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added "embed question" clarification
|
| Jan 13, 2012 at 5:24 | comment | added | Adam Lear StaffMod | Wouldn't that make it more confusing to find/read the answers to the original question? | |
| Jan 13, 2012 at 4:59 | history | asked | Jjed | CC BY-SA 3.0 |