Timeline for Why do we have a down vote rep threshold for meta?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
23 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2012 at 16:30 | history | notice removed | Adam Rackis | ||
| Feb 17, 2012 at 16:30 | history | bounty ended | Adam Rackis | ||
| Feb 13, 2012 at 15:44 | answer | added | Pollyanna | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 13, 2012 at 15:20 | history | notice added | Adam Rackis | Draw attention | |
| Feb 13, 2012 at 15:20 | history | bounty started | Adam Rackis | ||
| Feb 10, 2012 at 16:41 | history | edited | MozenRath | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
assimilating the suggestions to some point and giving it as a feature request
|
| Feb 10, 2012 at 16:23 | history | edited | MozenRath | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
changed according to present situation
|
| Feb 9, 2012 at 21:12 | comment | added | MozenRath | Thanks @AdamRackis! @ire_and_curses explained things that helped me undertand more about your suggestion to have same reputation for upvotes and downvotes | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 21:08 | vote | accept | MozenRath | ||
| Feb 9, 2012 at 21:01 | answer | added | ire_and_curses | timeline score: 23 | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 20:58 | history | edited | MozenRath | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 334 characters in body
|
| Feb 9, 2012 at 20:52 | comment | added | Adam Rackis | I don't know that I have a solid answer, but it just makes sense to me that you should have to spend more time here before you can downvote. | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 20:50 | history | edited | Toon Krijthe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 14 characters in body; edited title
|
| Feb 9, 2012 at 20:44 | comment | added | MozenRath | now that you point it out. weirds me out too. | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 20:41 | comment | added | ire_and_curses | @Adam Rackis - Why is it much harder to earn the right to disagree (125 rep), than to agree (15 rep)? That makes no sense to me. | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 20:39 | comment | added | MozenRath | I dont think so, Take my case. when I first saw meta, I knew nothing of it. and got a lot of down votes and am still paying for them simply because of that first time. I think I have earned the right to down vote by now. | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 20:37 | comment | added | Adam Rackis | @MozenRath - I'd say rep >= 125 would be much more simple, and direct to measure and implement that what you propose in your question. | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 20:35 | comment | added | MozenRath | As I have explained in the question, I agree that you have to earn the right. But not just with reputation. There are other ways(again, refer question). Do you not think something like that is feasible? | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 20:32 | comment | added | Adam Rackis | I understand @Andrew's comment to be simply that you have to earn the right to express disagreement here. Which I would agree with. | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 20:30 | comment | added | MozenRath | then maybe I am missing something about this privilege. Can you elaborate? | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 20:28 | comment | added | Andrew Barber | The answer to this question is exactly the same as the answer to this question for voting on the main site(s). The differences in voting you note have nothing to do with it. We require a bare minimum of reputation on Meta to express (dis)agreement by voting. That's it. | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 20:27 | history | edited | Andrew Barber | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| Feb 9, 2012 at 20:25 | history | asked | MozenRath | CC BY-SA 3.0 |