Timeline for Why do we have a down vote rep threshold for meta?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2013 at 5:43 | history | edited | ire_and_curses | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 126 characters in body
|
| Nov 28, 2013 at 14:34 | comment | added | TRiG | We do not suffer from a lack of threading. Threaded conversations are impossible to follow. | |
| Feb 14, 2012 at 21:10 | comment | added | jscs | Another bullet point under "Meta is for discussions" might be that answers which are downvoted to -3 or below are grayed out. This makes sense on a site where the answer may be technically wrong, but less so when it may simply represent an unpopular but valid opinion. | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 23:06 | comment | added | Andrew Barber | @ire_and_curses I have no such burden. You are proposing the change. | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 23:02 | comment | added | ire_and_curses | @Andrew Barber - Great. Disagreement is good for all of us. Why not post your own answer here outlining why you think there is no reason for voting to be different on meta? Then the community can vote on your ideas as they see fit. | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 21:52 | comment | added | Adam Rackis | I agree with @Andrew - this seems like a solution in search of a problem | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 21:49 | comment | added | Andrew Barber | I don't at all agree that there is any reason for voting to be different on meta. | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 21:17 | comment | added | Brad Larson | Another potential voting-related artifact on Meta: Should the automated ban on questions used on SO apply to Meta as well? | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 21:08 | vote | accept | MozenRath | ||
| Feb 9, 2012 at 21:01 | history | answered | ire_and_curses | CC BY-SA 3.0 |