Skip to main content
37 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:48 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://outdoors.stackexchange.com/ with https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:44 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://stats.stackexchange.com/ with https://stats.stackexchange.com/
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:43 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://dba.stackexchange.com/ with https://dba.stackexchange.com/
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
Mar 20, 2017 at 9:43 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.stackoverflow.com/ with https://meta.stackoverflow.com/
Apr 23, 2014 at 13:59 history edited CommunityBot
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
Apr 30, 2012 at 14:59 vote accept Ilmari Karonen
Mar 16, 2012 at 0:20 history edited Ilmari Karonen CC BY-SA 3.0
added 222 characters in body
Mar 15, 2012 at 1:05 history edited Nick CraverMod
edited tags
Mar 14, 2012 at 22:12 comment added Pops Ooh. Now that is a good use case, @sarnold. Perhaps I could get behind this after all.
Mar 14, 2012 at 12:41 comment added avpaderno It happened to me too, when I logged in to the "German Language & Usage" site. My other sites where all listed, but the reputation is just 1.
Mar 14, 2012 at 10:09 comment added sarnold @popular: Or your question gets migrated and you'd like to participate on the target site.
Mar 14, 2012 at 0:53 history edited Nick CraverMod
edited tags
Mar 13, 2012 at 20:31 comment added Zhaph - Ben Duguid Yep, registered on Judaism purely to respond to a comment thread on 28/2 and didn't have to wait - judaism.stackexchange.com/users/1291/…
Mar 13, 2012 at 20:26 comment added Pops @Zhaph-BenDuguid I know, I was the one who pointed Ivan here; he asked a question like this about half an hour ago and I voted to close as a dupe of this. The "used to be immediate" is news to me, though.
Mar 13, 2012 at 20:19 comment added Zhaph - Ben Duguid @PopularDemand also, it used to be immediate - I could sign-up to a site and vote immediately, not have to wait even twenty minutes. As Ivan notes in the comments to Nick's answer, he's been waiting a day ;)
Mar 13, 2012 at 20:04 comment added Ilmari Karonen @PopularDemand: This discussion is probably all beside the point, since Nick has confirmed that the delay is a bug and will be fixed. But every time I see something that I want to vote or comment on, on a site that I don't yet have an account on, I think "Is making this contribution worth the trouble of creating a new account?" Sometimes the answer is "yes", sometimes "no". If the process also involved a delay of even five minutes (much less 20 minutes or even hours), that answer would almost always be "no". Which might be a shame.
Mar 13, 2012 at 19:02 comment added Pops Bleh. If you cared that much, you wouldn't forget. Or at the very least you'd write yourself a reminder. And generally, a single edit/vote/flag doesn't seem very significant to me. There are other users. Now, in the interest of fairness, I will point out that I can't run a cost-benefit on improving the performance of bonus awarding since I don't know the cost. I just feel like even a minimal cost would outweigh the benefit.
Mar 13, 2012 at 18:55 comment added Zhaph - Ben Duguid @PopularDemand: drive by voting or commenting? You'd found an answer that addressed your pressing need and wanted to reward the people involved and would forget to come back in an hour?
Mar 13, 2012 at 14:46 comment added cdeszaq @PopularDemand - In my case, I ended up at a question that had issues that I wanted to help fix (suggested edit, flag, comment, etc.), but with only 1 rep, there isn't really much that can be done. Waiting for the rep to get bumped with the association bonus defeats the purpose in this case, since I just wanted to offer a quick fix and move on, rather than having to come back.
Mar 13, 2012 at 14:41 comment added Pops Although I don't doubt the validity of your statements, I am curious about why you need that +100 bonus to show up in 20 minutes or less.
Mar 13, 2012 at 13:40 comment added powtac Same here meta.stackexchange.com/questions/125482/…
Mar 13, 2012 at 13:20 history edited Ilmari Karonen CC BY-SA 3.0
added 261 characters in body
Mar 13, 2012 at 12:56 vote accept Ilmari Karonen
Mar 13, 2012 at 13:05
Mar 13, 2012 at 12:53 answer added Nick CraverMod timeline score: 29
Mar 13, 2012 at 12:53 history edited Nick CraverMod
edited tags
Mar 13, 2012 at 12:30 comment added cdeszaq I had the same issue, as well as issues transferring in account info: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/125417
Mar 13, 2012 at 12:14 history edited Ilmari Karonen CC BY-SA 3.0
added 205 characters in body
Mar 13, 2012 at 10:52 comment added Tobias Kienzler me too
Mar 12, 2012 at 23:46 comment added This_is_NOT_a_forum I can confirm this problem. It happened when I registered at a site, bicycles.stackexchange.com/users/3639. It seems something regarding the 100 rep bonus broke today. Previously the bonus was awarded immediately.
Mar 12, 2012 at 23:40 history edited Ilmari Karonen CC BY-SA 3.0
fix link
Mar 12, 2012 at 23:32 history edited Ilmari Karonen CC BY-SA 3.0
boldface, add paragraph
Mar 12, 2012 at 23:27 history edited Ilmari Karonen CC BY-SA 3.0
boldface
Mar 12, 2012 at 23:19 comment added Ilmari Karonen @Daniel: It was just shy of two hours, apparently, which is IMO a bit excessive, especially if one creates an account specifically to do something that needs more than 1 rep (like, say, posting an answer with more than two links). Surely it shouldn't be that hard to apply the bonus immediately?
Mar 12, 2012 at 23:17 history edited Ilmari Karonen CC BY-SA 3.0
added 341 characters in body
Mar 12, 2012 at 23:13 comment added Daniel Fischer It takes a while to update, apparently. Was it minutes or hours? Maybe you need to do something to make it update, I seem to remember some things were only updated upon user activity.
Mar 12, 2012 at 23:07 history asked Ilmari Karonen CC BY-SA 3.0