Timeline for Can we have the ability to retract a close vote before it closes?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 23, 2017 at 12:36 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
Aug 6, 2013 at 3:26 | history | edited | Ry-Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
Jan 24, 2013 at 10:29 | history | bounty ended | Martin Smith | ||
Mar 14, 2012 at 17:49 | comment | added | Justin ᚅᚔᚈᚄᚒᚔ | @Arjan: I don't think it was a matter of the page being cached (because I did do an explicit refresh, and because SO sets really short expire headers), but it's a possibility. I will have to do some experimentation to try and reproduce exactly what I was seeing. | |
Mar 14, 2012 at 17:27 | comment | added | Arjan | The deleted comment showing again is probably just a matter of looking at the cached page: the comment is in the HTML on page load, and then removed from the view (and marked deleted in the database) when you delete it. If you then come back to the page without actually reloading it, then most (if not all) browsers will show the initial HTML again, not the manipulated HTML. That's the same with votes et cetera. | |
Mar 14, 2012 at 15:37 | comment | added | Justin ᚅᚔᚈᚄᚒᚔ | @ChrisF: I tried deleting the "possible duplicate" comment yesterday to no avail; it would always show back up when I browsed to the question again. I just tried again and it appears to have worked. Perhaps there is some kind of "grace period" for auto-generated comments. | |
Mar 14, 2012 at 15:29 | comment | added | ChrisF Mod | The comment should be deletable. | |
Mar 14, 2012 at 15:11 | history | edited | Justin ᚅᚔᚈᚄᚒᚔ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Changed to slightly less powerful language.
|
Mar 13, 2012 at 22:26 | comment | added | Justin ᚅᚔᚈᚄᚒᚔ | @PopularDemand: No worries, I wasn't directing animosity; just reiterating why this feature is wanted in spite of expiring close votes. | |
Mar 13, 2012 at 19:05 | comment | added | Pops | Hey, I voted this request up in June of 2010, I'm not the enemy. I just don't like incorrect information. | |
Mar 13, 2012 at 18:57 | comment | added | Justin ᚅᚔᚈᚄᚒᚔ | @PopularDemand: ...and a little longer than it should, if the vote was cast in error. If close votes do still expire, then maybe the word to use is "silly" rather than "asinine". Regardless, I and at least 320 of my peers would still love to see this feature implemented. | |
Mar 13, 2012 at 18:49 | comment | added | Pops | This isn't quite true... close votes do still expire except on questions with extremely few views (<100, I believe). It just takes a little longer than it used to. | |
Mar 13, 2012 at 18:42 | history | answered | Justin ᚅᚔᚈᚄᚒᚔ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |