Timeline for View *my* deleted question and answer with less than 10K
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
22 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:59 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| May 9, 2013 at 5:08 | answer | added | Shog9 | timeline score: 15 | |
| May 9, 2013 at 5:04 | history | edited | Shog9 |
edited tags
|
|
| May 9, 2013 at 5:04 | history | reopened | Shog9 | ||
| Mar 27, 2013 at 5:27 | comment | added | user200500 | @NickCraver Could you please add an answer detailing that on the original question? Just so we have a valid counter argument and can let it come to rest one way or another? | |
| Mar 12, 2013 at 18:59 | history | closed |
Lance Roberts Martijn Pieters Bo Persson Bart Himanshu |
exact duplicate | |
| Mar 12, 2013 at 15:34 | review | Close votes | |||
| Mar 12, 2013 at 18:59 | |||||
| Mar 6, 2013 at 13:04 | comment | added | Engineer2021 | This is a common sense request, why not add it? | |
| Apr 26, 2012 at 13:52 | answer | added | Mark Booth | timeline score: 27 | |
| Apr 26, 2012 at 12:58 | comment | added | gnat | @NickCraver why don't you put this as an answer? your tried-and-false reasoning makes perfect sense to me and likely to OP as well | |
| Mar 16, 2012 at 14:05 | comment | added | M.Babcock | @NickCraver - Fair enough. It just seems like it might cause a lot of static in the metas, but if its been tried and didn't work then my solution would likely be worse than the problem itself. | |
| Mar 16, 2012 at 13:55 | comment | added | Nick Craver Mod | @M.Babcock - unfortunately you can't, show people deleted questions before having high rep has ended in quite a mess in the past, I don't think we'll repeat that anytime soon. Luckily, at your current rate, 10k isn't that far off. | |
| Mar 16, 2012 at 12:52 | comment | added | M.Babcock | @NickCraver - You found the missing piece to my question... in the case where I answer a question which is later voluntarily removed by its author (such as the one from my initial question), how could I know whether it warrants soliciting mods to reopen it? | |
| Mar 16, 2012 at 12:49 | comment | added | M.Babcock | @CodyGray - Re-read your initial comment - my mistake. The problem is the question is deleted (hence I cannot see it or my answer on it) so there is no way for me to know whether to bring the question to moderator attention for being removed when it has value. The people who answered a question which was deleted voluntarily by its asker have stake in having it reopened. | |
| Mar 16, 2012 at 10:20 | comment | added | Nick Craver Mod | Cody is correct, unless the parent question is deleted, you can already see your deleted answers - we even link to them in your reputation tab (again, if the parent isn't deleted). If you're 10k and could see it in either case, we also link. | |
| Mar 16, 2012 at 5:47 | comment | added | Ben Lee | Is what you want this?: The ability, with less than 10k rep, to see deleted questions on which you have a posted answer? The ability to see your questions/answers that you deleted yourself has always been there. | |
| Mar 16, 2012 at 4:37 | comment | added | Cody Gray | I was pretty sure that you could always view your own deleted answers, regardless of your reputation level. | |
| Mar 16, 2012 at 3:54 | history | edited | M.Babcock | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
| Mar 16, 2012 at 3:53 | history | rollback | M.Babcock |
Rollback to Revision 1
|
|
| Mar 16, 2012 at 3:53 | history | edited | M.Babcock | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 27 characters in body
|
| Mar 16, 2012 at 3:44 | history | asked | M.Babcock | CC BY-SA 3.0 |