Timeline for The answer to tactical downvoting problem?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://english.stackexchange.com/ with https://english.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jan 28, 2015 at 15:31 | history | edited | endolith | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 28 characters in body
|
| Apr 24, 2014 at 13:34 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Mar 12, 2014 at 16:34 | history | edited | endolith | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
add another proposal
|
| Oct 11, 2013 at 21:03 | history | edited | endolith | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| May 22, 2012 at 21:18 | history | edited | endolith | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
an example
|
| May 10, 2012 at 2:44 | history | edited | endolith | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 58 characters in body
|
| May 10, 2012 at 2:43 | comment | added | endolith | @AndrewBarber: I've never seen any defenders of vote-locking provide any evidence that it actually helps anything, no. If there was some, this would be a good place to put it: meta.stackexchange.com/q/18370/130885 Do you have data which suggests it's not causing more problems than it solves? | |
| May 10, 2012 at 2:23 | comment | added | Andrew Barber | Do you have data which suggests locking in votes has not served its intended purpose? Because I bet SE has data that shows it has. | |
| May 10, 2012 at 2:17 | history | answered | endolith | CC BY-SA 3.0 |