Timeline for Can I please be trusted to not to script a bot that dumps an endless stream of spam messages into the chat?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 5, 2018 at 2:45 | comment | added | Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog | Is this still being reviewed? | |
Nov 26, 2012 at 12:17 | comment | added | sbi | @Shog9: The limit is something that has to have been built in explicitly. But it's a misfeature, to say the least which affects very many users daily. And if it really is that hard to fix, then that's a bad code smell in my book, and all the more reason to clean up that code ASAP. | |
Nov 21, 2012 at 15:10 | comment | added | Shog9 | I don't know that it's "too hard to fix", @sbi - but it's more than a trivial change. And it annoys me daily, but... I get by. | |
Nov 21, 2012 at 14:49 | comment | added | sbi | @Shog9: How can something be too hard to fix when it, literally, annoys hundreds, if not thousands of people? | |
Nov 21, 2012 at 14:29 | comment | added | Shog9 | FWIW, @sbi: apparently adjusting the rate-limiter based on reputation is a bit trickier than it sounds. I know balpha's looked into doing this once or twice. | |
Jul 29, 2012 at 15:03 | comment | added | Pekka | The "SE" is a tiny bit too sharp around the edges to fit into the rest of the picture, but +1 for the painstaking realism with which you edged "CHAT" into the image. | |
Jun 25, 2012 at 21:10 | comment | added | sbi | It's really great to see again that meta works so well. You make a suggestion, it's heavily upvoted, even SE folks agree with you — and then the thing is buried under the huge pile of similar well-received but never acted-upon suggestions. Uh. That is, what meta was invented for, right? | |
May 17, 2012 at 4:54 | history | answered | Shog9 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |