Timeline for If you really want to reduce the snark level
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2012 at 9:10 | comment | added | Rob W | Following the comment of @UristMcBobby, I also had to look up the exact meaning of snarky: en.wiktionary.org/wiki/snarky | |
| Jun 29, 2012 at 18:56 | comment | added | Oleg V. Volkov | @Charles, snark detected. Flags away! | |
| Jun 29, 2012 at 16:49 | comment | added | Charles | The tagging on the actual question makes me want to murder something. Or retag it. No, wait, definitely murder. | |
| Jun 29, 2012 at 14:43 | comment | added | John Dibling | Please provide a link to the Q so that we can have some more context. | |
| Jun 29, 2012 at 14:20 | comment | added | Time Traveling Bobby | How exactly is that snarky? I misread the question in the first moment, too. I mean, please excuse me, I had to look up what snark exactly means, but that's far from my definition. A response from the OP clarifying what it meant, and everyone is happy again... | |
| Jun 29, 2012 at 13:59 | comment | added | AakashM | Don't need a new flag type for that comment - 'not constructive' already exists... | |
| Jun 29, 2012 at 13:31 | comment | added | Rob | @dystroy - the commenters most highly voted tag, nearly double that of the next one, is c#. I, personally, highly doubt that it's a misread. | |
| Jun 29, 2012 at 13:28 | comment | added | Denys Séguret | In my opinion this commenter just misread the question and didn't yet had his coffee. This could be me if I knew the first thing about C#. Sometimes I come back to the question after the coffee and delete the stupid comment... | |
| Jun 29, 2012 at 13:19 | history | answered | Rob | CC BY-SA 3.0 |