6 replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
source | link

Possible Duplicate:
Could we have the ability to mark a change as minor in questions or answers?Could we have the ability to mark a change as minor in questions or answers?
Can trivial edits not bump the question?Can trivial edits not bump the question?

I see that another round of "lets tidy up" has happened, at least around the Perl tag. I'm all for removing "thanks"es and getting the tags correct, but it brings up a wave of old questions that will tempt people into answering. Can't there be a way to say "I'm editing, but leave it inactive"? I propose a button next to edit that says, edit-but-inactive or some such.

As I type I see that this has been asked in several ways: http://meta.stackexchange.com/q/102499/153062"Trivial edit" checkbox and http://meta.stackexchange.com/q/18793/153062Should all answer edits make old questions look "active"? but neither is quite exactly what I'm asking, and the problem keeps popping up.

Possible Duplicate:
Could we have the ability to mark a change as minor in questions or answers?
Can trivial edits not bump the question?

I see that another round of "lets tidy up" has happened, at least around the Perl tag. I'm all for removing "thanks"es and getting the tags correct, but it brings up a wave of old questions that will tempt people into answering. Can't there be a way to say "I'm editing, but leave it inactive"? I propose a button next to edit that says, edit-but-inactive or some such.

As I type I see that this has been asked in several ways: http://meta.stackexchange.com/q/102499/153062 and http://meta.stackexchange.com/q/18793/153062 but neither is quite exactly what I'm asking, and the problem keeps popping up.

Possible Duplicate:
Could we have the ability to mark a change as minor in questions or answers?
Can trivial edits not bump the question?

I see that another round of "lets tidy up" has happened, at least around the Perl tag. I'm all for removing "thanks"es and getting the tags correct, but it brings up a wave of old questions that will tempt people into answering. Can't there be a way to say "I'm editing, but leave it inactive"? I propose a button next to edit that says, edit-but-inactive or some such.

As I type I see that this has been asked in several ways: "Trivial edit" checkbox and Should all answer edits make old questions look "active"? but neither is quite exactly what I'm asking, and the problem keeps popping up.

5 Migration of MSO links to MSE links
source | link

Possible Duplicate:
Could we have the ability to mark a change as minor in questions or answers?Could we have the ability to mark a change as minor in questions or answers?
Can trivial edits not bump the question?Can trivial edits not bump the question?

I see that another round of "lets tidy up" has happened, at least around the Perl tag. I'm all for removing "thanks"es and getting the tags correct, but it brings up a wave of old questions that will tempt people into answering. Can't there be a way to say "I'm editing, but leave it inactive"? I propose a button next to edit that says, edit-but-inactive or some such.

As I type I see that this has been asked in several ways: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/102499/153062http://meta.stackexchange.com/q/102499/153062 and http://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/18793/153062http://meta.stackexchange.com/q/18793/153062 but neither is quite exactly what I'm asking, and the problem keeps popping up.

Possible Duplicate:
Could we have the ability to mark a change as minor in questions or answers?
Can trivial edits not bump the question?

I see that another round of "lets tidy up" has happened, at least around the Perl tag. I'm all for removing "thanks"es and getting the tags correct, but it brings up a wave of old questions that will tempt people into answering. Can't there be a way to say "I'm editing, but leave it inactive"? I propose a button next to edit that says, edit-but-inactive or some such.

As I type I see that this has been asked in several ways: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/102499/153062 and http://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/18793/153062 but neither is quite exactly what I'm asking, and the problem keeps popping up.

Possible Duplicate:
Could we have the ability to mark a change as minor in questions or answers?
Can trivial edits not bump the question?

I see that another round of "lets tidy up" has happened, at least around the Perl tag. I'm all for removing "thanks"es and getting the tags correct, but it brings up a wave of old questions that will tempt people into answering. Can't there be a way to say "I'm editing, but leave it inactive"? I propose a button next to edit that says, edit-but-inactive or some such.

As I type I see that this has been asked in several ways: http://meta.stackexchange.com/q/102499/153062 and http://meta.stackexchange.com/q/18793/153062 but neither is quite exactly what I'm asking, and the problem keeps popping up.

4 insert duplicate link
source | link

Possible Duplicate:
Could we have the ability to mark a change as minor in questions or answers?
Can trivial edits not bump the question?

I see that another round of "lets tidy up" has happened, at least around the Perl tag. I'm all for removing "thanks"es and getting the tags correct, but it brings up a wave of old questions that will tempt people into answering. Can't there be a way to say "I'm editing, but leave it inactive"? I propose a button next to edit that says, edit-but-inactive or some such.

As I type I see that this has been asked in several ways: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/102499/153062 and http://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/18793/153062 but neither is quite exactly what I'm asking, and the problem keeps popping up.

I see that another round of "lets tidy up" has happened, at least around the Perl tag. I'm all for removing "thanks"es and getting the tags correct, but it brings up a wave of old questions that will tempt people into answering. Can't there be a way to say "I'm editing, but leave it inactive"? I propose a button next to edit that says, edit-but-inactive or some such.

As I type I see that this has been asked in several ways: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/102499/153062 and http://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/18793/153062 but neither is quite exactly what I'm asking, and the problem keeps popping up.

Possible Duplicate:
Could we have the ability to mark a change as minor in questions or answers?
Can trivial edits not bump the question?

I see that another round of "lets tidy up" has happened, at least around the Perl tag. I'm all for removing "thanks"es and getting the tags correct, but it brings up a wave of old questions that will tempt people into answering. Can't there be a way to say "I'm editing, but leave it inactive"? I propose a button next to edit that says, edit-but-inactive or some such.

As I type I see that this has been asked in several ways: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/102499/153062 and http://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/18793/153062 but neither is quite exactly what I'm asking, and the problem keeps popping up.

    Post Closed as "exact duplicate" by yoozer8, animuson, Arjan, Bo Persson, Mystery of
3 edited tags
| link
2 edited title
| link
1
source | link