Timeline for "Sidekick" badge
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2021 at 11:49 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://blog.stackoverflow.com with https://blog.stackoverflow.com
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:11 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Jul 14, 2009 at 0:21 | vote | accept | Jeff Yates | ||
| Jul 13, 2009 at 17:16 | history | edited | Kyle CroninMod | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
changed link to blog post
|
| Jul 13, 2009 at 16:35 | comment | added | ChrisF Mod | Great. another badge (actually 2 - see Reversal) that I'm not going to get ;) | |
| Jul 13, 2009 at 15:17 | history | edited | Kyle CroninMod | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 98 characters in body
|
| Jul 1, 2009 at 18:40 | comment | added | Jeff Yates | That's a good point. If you have one, the other is pretty much covered. I guess that having it for upvoted answers or questions encourages people to contribute to good posts whereas having it for any comment just encourages people to comment. Perhaps the latter is a better goal to have, as you suggest. | |
| Jul 1, 2009 at 18:38 | comment | added | Kyle Cronin Mod | I don't know, if we have a "running commentary" badge, I'm not sure what need we have for a "sidekick" badge. I don't think that commenting on great answers is any more noteworthy than commenting on regular answers. | |
| Jul 1, 2009 at 18:30 | comment | added | Jeff Yates | Yes, I think another badge for high upvotes is also in order. Sidekick for upvotes on good answers/questions, and perhaps a Running Commentary badge for those with just high upvotes on a comment. | |
| Jul 1, 2009 at 18:27 | history | answered | Kyle CroninMod | CC BY-SA 2.5 |